The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy FawkesSpink, Henry
History
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes
Spink, Henry
Gunpowder Plot, 1605; Monteagle, William Parker, Baron, 1574 or 1575-1622
[Footnote 7:——The letters “wghe” are not, at this date (5th October,
1900), clearly discernible.]
[Footnote 8:——See letter dated November, 1605——Sir Edward Hoby to Sir
Thomas Edmonds. Add. MSS. in British Museum, No. 4176, where name “Thomas
Ward” is given.]
[Footnote 9:——Stowe’s “_Chronicle_,” continued by Howes, p. 880. Ed. 1631.
From the evidence of William Kydall, it was physically impossible for
Thomas Winter to confer with Christopher Wright, Wright being nearly 100
miles away from London “the next day after the delivery of the Letter,”
for the next day would be Sunday, October the 27th. Wright reached London
in the afternoon of Wednesday, the 30th.
See Appendix respecting discrepancy as to date not affecting allegation of
fact when the former is not of the essence of the statement, per Lord
Chief Justice Scroggs, _temp._ Charles II.]
[Footnote 10:——Fawkes was apprehended at “midnight without the House,”
according to “_A Discourse of this late intended Treason_.” Knevet having
given notice that he had secured Fawkes, thereupon Suffolk, Salisbury, and
the Council went to the King’s chamber at the Palace in Whitehall, and
Fawkes was brought into the Royal Presence. This was at about four o’clock
in the morning of Tuesday, the 5th of November.
Fawkes showed the calmest behaviour conceivable in the Royal Presence. To
those whom he regarded as being of authority he was respectful, yet very
firm; but towards those whom he deemed as of no account, he was humorously
scornful. The man’s self control was astounding. He told his auditory that
“a dangerous disease requires a desperate remedy!” (See “_King’s Book_.”)
Whitehall Palace had been a Royal Palace since the reign of Henry VIII.;
it was burned down in the time of William and Mary. It was formerly what
St. James’s Palace is now in relation to royal functions.
It was at St. James’s Palace that His Most Gracious Majesty King Edward
VII. deigned to receive the respectful address of condolence on the death
of His late beloved Imperial Mother, and of loyal assurance of devoted
attachment to His Throne and Person from Cardinal Vaughan, together with
several Bishops, the Duke of Norfolk, the Marquis of Ripon, the Lord
Mowbray and Stourton, and the Lord Herries, including other peers and
representatives of the English Roman Catholic laity.
By a singular coincidence the day happened to be the 295th anniversary of
the execution of Father Henry Garnet, S.J., in St. Paul’s Churchyard,
London (3rd May, 1606): a coincidence of happy augury, let us devoutly
hope, that old things are about to pass away, and that all things are
about to become new!]
[Footnote 11:——Essex House was between the Strand and the River Thames.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account