The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy FawkesSpink, Henry
History
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes
Spink, Henry
Gunpowder Plot, 1605; Monteagle, William Parker, Baron, 1574 or 1575-1622
[Footnote 164:——In this connection the following words of the conspirator
John Grant should be remembered. After the Jury had found a verdict of
“guilty” against the prisoners, at Westminster Hall, on being asked what
he could say wherefore judgment of death should not be pronounced against
him, Grant replied, “He was guilty of a conspiracy intended, but never
effected.”
_Cf._ Wordsworth’s Sonnet on the Gunpowder Plot, which is very
penetrating.]
[Footnote 165:——Let it be remembered by the gentle, though unreflecting,
reader who is disposed to be unnerved at the sound of the word “Casuist,”
as at the sound of something “uncanny,” that Casuistry is that great
science, so indispensable to statesmen, warriors, and politicians,
especially in these days of democratic self-government, whereby the
electing, self-governing people are told by their own authorized expert
representatives so much of public affairs as it is for the common good
should be known by them, _but no more_. The late Right Hon. W. E.
Gladstone once styled Casuistry “a great and noble science.” Now, the
Marquis of Salisbury, K.G., the present Prime Minister of King Edward
VII., denominated Mr. Gladstone in the House of Lords, when paying his
tribute to the memory of that “king of men,” “a great Christian
statesman.” And justly; for although Mr. Gladstone was himself a master in
the science of Casuistry, the object that science has in view is to forge
a palladium for Truth, and this at the cost of endless intellectual
labour. Casuistry, properly understood, counts all mere intellectual toils
as cheaply purchased, no matter at what cost, provided only that Truth
herself——unsullied Truth——be saved. For, after its kind, in whatever
sphere, Truth is infinitely more excellent than the diamond, neither is
the ruby so lovely; while _partial Truth_, according to its degree, is not
less true than the full orb of Truth.]
[Footnote 166:——This phrase, “sacrilegious murder,” is used by Shakespeare
in “Macbeth,” and so precisely does it express the double crime of the
Gunpowder plotters that I feel certain that from this allusion——as well as
from the evident allusion to the well-known equivocations of Father Henry
Garnet (alias Farmer) before the Privy Council——the great dramatist must
have had the Gunpowder Plot in his mind the whole time he wrote this
finest of his tragedies.
I suggest, too, that the words “The bell invites me. Hear it not, Duncan?
for it is a knell that summons thee to heaven or to hell” are an allusion
to the mysterious warning bell that the plotters thought they heard whilst
working in the mine.——See Jardine’s “_Narrative of the Gunpowder Plot_,”
p. 54.
Compare also Mr. H. W. Mabie’s description of the tragedy of “Macbeth” in
his very recent and valuable “_Life of Shakespeare_” (Macmillan & Co.).
Mr. Mabie’s account sounds in one’s ears like a very echo of a recital of
the facts and purposes of the Gunpowder Plot.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account