The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy FawkesSpink, Henry
History
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes
Spink, Henry
Gunpowder Plot, 1605; Monteagle, William Parker, Baron, 1574 or 1575-1622
Dr. Lancelot Andrewes (in answer to Cardinal Bellarmine) and Isaac
Casaubon also contributed to the literature of the controversies anent the
Plot, and modern editions of their works with notes are desiderata.
Casaubon is best known, at the present day, through his “_Life_,” by Mark
Pattison; Andrewes, through the late Dr. R. W. Church’s “Lecture,” now in
“_The Pascal_” volume (Macmillan) of that judicious and learned man.]
[Footnote 170:——See Jardine’s “_Criminal Trials_,” vol. ii., p. 120,
quoting “_Apologia_,” p. 200.
Sir Everard Digby was the only conspirator who pleaded “guilty,” and he
was arraigned by a different Indictment from that which charged the rest
of the surviving conspirators.]
[Footnote 171:——My contention is that the conclusion is inevitable to the
discerning mind that the sphinx-like nescience——the face set like a
flint——with which Oldcorne met Littleton’s inquiry, displays indisputable
evidence of a sub-consciousness on Oldcorne’s part, of what? Of a
_special_, _private_, _official knowledge_ (as distinct from a general,
public, personal knowledge) of what had been intended to be the executed
Gunpowder Plot, but which Oldcorne himself had thwarted, and so prevented
everlastingly any one single human creature being able, even for the
infinitesimal part of an instant, to contemplate “_post factum_”——after
the fact——and in the concrete; which, indeed, judged “from the outside,”
and as the bulk of mankind are entitled to judge it, was the only side or
aspect of the baleful enterprise that was of practical and, therefore, to
them, of paramount personal consequence. The conspirator John Grant
expressed the state of the case exactly when he said in Westminster Hall,
after being asked what he could say wherefore judgment of death should not
be pronounced against him, “He was guilty of a conspiracy intended, but
never effected.”]
[Footnote 172:——See Butler’s “_Memoirs of English Catholics_,” vol. ii.,
p. 260. See also Gerard’s “_Narrative_.”——It is possible (according to
Gerard) that Oldcorne may have been even still more cruelly tortured,
namely, as Dr. Lingard says, during five hours for each of five successive
days; but to me, humanly speaking, this is incredible.]
[Footnote 173:——Father Edward Oldcorne and Brother Ralph Ashley are both,
along with others, now styled by Rome, “Venerable Servants of God.” The
Decree introducing the cause of these “English Martyrs,” dated 1886, and
signed by the present Pope, Leo XIII., is kept in the English College at
Rome, where Oldcorne had himself entered as a student a little more than
three hundred and four years previously, namely, in 1582.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account