The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy FawkesSpink, Henry
History
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes
Spink, Henry
Gunpowder Plot, 1605; Monteagle, William Parker, Baron, 1574 or 1575-1622
“‘Go you then,’ quoth I, ‘to Mr. Percy, for sure it is for him they seek,
and bid him be gone: I will stay and see the uttermost.’”
(5) Furthermore; Lathbury, writing in the year 1839,[A] asserts that
Christopher Wright’s advice was that each conspirator “should betake
himself to flight in a different direction from any of his
companions.”[124]
[Footnote A: Lathbury’s little book, published by Parker, is a very
careful compilation (_me judice_). It contains an extract from the Act of
Parliament ordaining an Annual Thanksgiving for November 5th; also in the
second Edition (1840) an excellent fac-simile of Lord Mounteagle’s Letter.
In Father Gerard’s “_What was the Gunpowder Plot?_” (1896), on p. 173, is
a fac-simile of the signature of Edward Oldcorne both before and after
torture.]
CHAPTER XXXVIII.
Now, as somewhat slightly confirming this statement of Lathbury, is the
fact that in an old print published soon after the discovery of the Plot,
which shows the conspirators Catesby, Thomas Winter, Percy, John Wright,
Fawkes, Robert Winter, Bates, and Christopher Wright, Christopher Wright
is represented as a tall man, in the high hat of the period, facing
Catesby, and evidently engaged in earnest discourse with the
arch-conspirator. Christopher Wright to enforce his utterance is holding
up the forefinger of his right hand. Catesby’s right hand is raised in
front of Christopher Wright, while Catesby’s left hand rests on the hilt
of the sword girded on his side.[125]
(Of course the evidence in paragraphs (2) and (5) of the last chapter may
have emanated from one and the same source; but the great point is that it
_has emanated from somewhere_.)
In connection with Christopher Wright’s propinquity to Thomas Ward
possibly, and to Thomas Winter possibly likewise, on the Sunday
immediately previous to the “fatal Fifth,” the two following items of
evidence are of consequence:——
(1) In Jardine’s “_Narrative_,” p. 98, we are told: “On Sunday, the 3rd of
November, the conspirators heard from the same individual who had first
informed them of the Letter to Lord Mounteagle, that the Letter had been
shown to the King, who made great account of it, but enjoined the
strictest secrecy.”
_This individual was Thomas Ward._——(Jardine.)
Now, we have seen already that Stowe’s “_Chronicle_” records “the next day
after the delivery of the Letter” there was a conjunction of the
planets——Thomas Winter and Christopher Wright.
This conjunction at or about this period I hold to be a very significant
fact, tending to show that _either_ the one or the other must have sought
his confederate out, as has been remarked already.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account