The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy FawkesSpink, Henry
History
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes
Spink, Henry
Gunpowder Plot, 1605; Monteagle, William Parker, Baron, 1574 or 1575-1622
“I doe acknowledge that uppon thursday morninge beeing the 7th
of November 1605 my selfe and all the other gentlemen (as I doe
remember) did confesse o^{r} sinnes to one Mr. Hamonde Preeste,
at Mr. Robert Wintour his house, and amonges other my sinnes I
did acknowledge my error in concealing theire intended
enterprise of pouder agaynste his Ma^{tie} and the State, having
a scruple in conscience, the facte seeminge to mee to bee too
bluddye, hee for all in generall gave me absolution without any
other circumstances beeing hastned by the multitude that were to
come to him.
“Ambrose Rookewoode.
“Ex^{r} p. Edw. Coke
W. Ward.”
(Endorsed)
“... pouder
xx^{th} of January 1605.
hamond
Declaration of Ambrose
Rookewoode of his own hand.”
CHAPTER XLI.
Now, regard being had to the fact that this kneeling young Penitent was,
with his own lips, avowing the commission in _desire and thought_ of
“murder most foul as at the best it is”[A] (and “we know that no murderer
hath eternal life abiding in him”[B]), by confessing to a fellow-creature
a wilful and deliberate transgression against that “steadfast Moral Law
which is not of to-day nor yesterday, but which lives for ever”[C] (to say
nothing of his avowal of the commission _in act and deed_ of the crime of
sacrilege,[D] in taking a secret, unlawful oath contrary to the express
prohibitions of a visible and audible Institution which that Priest and
that Penitent alike believed was of divine origin), I firmly, though with
great and all-becoming deference, draw _these_ conclusions, namely, that
_one of the plotters_ had _already_ poured into the bending ear of his
breathless priestly hearer _glad tidings_ to the effect that he (the
revealing plotter, whoever he was) had given that one supreme external
proof which heaven and earth had then left to him for showing the
genuineness of his repentance in regard to his crimes, and the perfectness
of his contrition on account of his transgressions, by taking
premeditated, active, practical, vigorous steps for the utter frustrating
and the complete overthrowing of the prodigious, diabolical Plot.
[Footnote A: Shakespeare.]
[Footnote B: St. John the Divine.]
[Footnote C: Sophocles.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account