The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy FawkesSpink, Henry
History
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes
Spink, Henry
Gunpowder Plot, 1605; Monteagle, William Parker, Baron, 1574 or 1575-1622
Jardine gives in his “_Criminal Trials_”[133] a certain Letter of
Instructions to Sir Edward Coke,[134] the Attorney-General who conducted
the prosecution of the surviving Gunpowder conspirators at Westminster
Hall[135] before a Special Commission for High Treason, on the 27th day of
January, 1605-6.
This very remarkable document is in the handwriting of Robert Cecil first
Earl of Salisbury.
It is as follows:——
“These things I am commanded to renew unto your memory. First,
that you be sure to make it appear to the world that there was
an employment of some persons to Spain for a practice of
invasion, as soon as the Queen’s breath was out of her body. The
reason is this for which the King doth urge it. He saith some
men there are that will give out, and do, that only despair of
the King’s courses on the Catholics and his severity, draw all
these to such works of discontentment: where by you it will
appear, that before his Majesty’s face was ever seen, or that he
had done anything in government, the King of Spain was moved,
though he refused it, saying, ‘he rather expected to have
peace,’ etc.
“_Next, you must in any case, when you speak of the Letter which
was the first ground of discovery, absolutely disclaim that any
of these wrote it, though you leave the further judgment
indefinite who else it should be._ (The italics are mine.)
“Lastly, and you must not omit, you must deliver, in
commendation of my Lord Mounteagle, words to show how sincerely
he dealt, and how fortunately it proved that he was the
instrument of so great a blessing as this was. To be short, sir,
you can remember how well the King in his Book did censure[A]
his lordship’s part in it, from which sense you are not to vary,
but _obiter_ (as you know best how), to give some good echo of
that particular action in that day of public trial of these men;
because it is so lewdly given out that he was once of this plot
of powder, and afterwards betrayed it all to me.
“This is but _ex abundanti_, that I do trouble you; but as they
come to my head or knowledge, or that I am directed, I am not
scrupulous to send to you.
“You must remember to lay Owen as foul in this as you can.”
[Footnote A: The word “censure” here means, formed an opinion of his
lordship’s part. From Lat. _censeo_, I think.]
Now, strangely enough, in the day of public trial of these men, the
learned Attorney-General forgot in one particular the aforesaid clear and
express Injunctions of his Majesty’s principal Secretary of State.
For, if he be correctly reported, Sir Edward Coke then said:——[136]
“The last consideration is concerning the admirable discovery of this
treason, _which was by one of themselves_, _who had taken the oath and
sacrament, as hath been said, against his own will; the means was by a
dark and doubtful letter sent to my Lord Mounteagle._”[A] (The italics are
mine.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account