The hand of Providence : $b as shown in the history of nations and individuals, from the great apostasy to the restoration of the gospelWard, J. H. (Joseph Harvey)
Religion
The hand of Providence : $b as shown in the history of nations and individuals, from the great apostasy to the restoration of the gospel
Ward, J. H. (Joseph Harvey)
Church history -- Juvenile literature; Great Apostasy (Mormon doctrine); World history -- Juvenile literature
Why was it then that such a marvelous change should take place in
the minds of the American people, during the next twelve years? In
1764 the colonists loved England as their mother country. In 1776
they had learned to despise her authority. They bound themselves, by
solemn oaths, to use no article of English manufacture. They publicly
burned the Acts of the English Parliament. They even killed the king's
soldiers and cast from them forever his authority. By what terrible
magic was this change wrought so swiftly: that three millions of people
should be taught to abhor the country they once loved?
To answer this question rightly we must remember that the cause of the
colonists was one of popular rights against royal prerogative, that the
best and wisest men in England were in favor of the colonists; that
even William Pitt, the {166} greatest statesman England had ever seen,
declared openly in Parliament, "I rejoice that America has resisted."
We must also bear in mind that for many years England had governed her
American colonies harshly; and in a spirit of undisguised selfishness,
America was ruled not for her own good but for the good of English
commerce. The colonists were not allowed to export their products
except to England. No foreign ships were permitted to enter colonial
ports. Whatever were the exorbitant demands of English manufacturers or
merchants, still the colonists were not permitted to buy at a cheaper
market. Still more, certain goods, woolen for example, were not allowed
to be sent from one colony to another. The manufacture of hats was
forbidden, and even the Bible was not allowed to be printed in America.
The colonists had long borne the cost of their own government and
defense. But in that age of profuse expenditure on useless wars, the
king and nobility of England thought to gather from America's toiling
sons the means to pay for their own misrule. The Parliament of England
passed a law to tax America. The colonists replied they were willing to
vote what moneys the king required of them; but they vehemently denied
the right of any assembly, in which they were not represented, to take
from them any portion of their property. Another law was also passed
requiring a royal stamp to be placed on every legal document. Benjamin
Franklin had been sent to England by the colonists. He went to plead
their cause before the British government. He told them plainly that
the colonists could not submit to such taxation. The act was to come
in force on the first of November, 1763. On that day the church bells
were tolled, and the people wore the aspect of those on whom some heavy
calamity had fallen. Not one of the stamps was ever sold in America.
Without stamps mercantile transactions ceased to be binding, notes were
not legal, marriages were null. Yet the business of life went on. Men
married; they bought; they sold--illegally, because without stamps; but
no harm came of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account