The Standard of Sir HENRY DE STAFFORD, K.G., second son of HENRY, second
Duke of BUCKINGHAM (executed in 1483), is represented in No. 415, from a
drawing in the Heralds’ College. It is charged, first, with _a cross of
St. George_: then, on a _field per fesse sable and gules_ (the colours
of the Duke’s livery), _the White Swan_ of the De Bohuns, with the
_silver Stafford-knot_ (No. 304), differenced with _a Crescent gules_
for Cadency; the Motto is HVMBLE : ET: LOYAL; and the fringe, of the
same colours as the field, is _componée sa. and gu._ In other examples a
greater variety of Badges is introduced. The student will not fail to
take notice of the systematic display of the ensign of St. George in
these Standards, as the national armorial device of England. The use and
heraldic display of these standards had practically lapsed, but the
College of Arms has now reverted to its ancient practice of recording
them in cases of the grant or confirmation of a Badge.
[Illustration: No. 416.--The Royal Standard, or Banner.]
The ROYAL STANDARD (to give it its popular name) is not really a
Standard at all, but is the King’s Banner of his arms. It stands at the
head of our English Flags of the present day, and bears the full
blazonry of the Royal Arms of His Majesty THE KING, as they are
marshalled on the Royal Shield: No. 416. It is personal to the King, and
its use by other people is not permitted. This splendid Flag, so truly
heraldic in its character, and charged with Coat-Armour and not with
Badges, ought to be styled the ROYAL BANNER. The same Standard is duly
differenced with their own Marks of Cadency and their Shields of
Pretence for the different members of the Royal Family. For use at sea,
whilst the PRINCE OF WALES has his own Flag or Banner of his arms, all
other members of the Royal Family use a flag showing the Royal Arms
within a bordure ermine. QUEEN MARY and QUEEN ALEXANDRA fly flags of
their impaled arms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account