The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishesBertram, James Glass
Science
The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishes
Bertram, James Glass
Fish culture; Fisheries -- Great Britain; Fishes
The herring breeds, then, and is caught in greater or lesser
quantities, during every month of the year. There is no general
close-time for the herring in Scotland. On one or two parts of the west
coast it has hitherto been illegal to capture this fish at certain
seasons, although the restrictions are not general. How is it that the
time selected by fishermen for the capture of this fish corresponds
with the period when it is a crime to take a salmon? If a gravid
salmon be unwholesome, is a gravid herring good for food? Do not the
same physical laws affect both of these fish? There cannot be a doubt
but that at the period of spawning, this fish, as well as all other
fish, is in its worst condition so far as its food-yielding qualities
are concerned, because at that time of its life its whole nutritive
power is exerted on behalf of its seed, and its flesh is consequently
lean and unpalatable. Yet it is a great fact that the time which the
herring selects in order to fulfil the grandest instinct of its nature
is the very time appointed by man for its capture! In fact, that is
the period when herrings are at a premium; they must be “full fish,”
or they cannot obtain the official brand; in other words, _shotten_
herrings—_i.e._ fish that have spawned—are not of much more than half
the value of the others. When it is taken into account that each pair
of full fish (male and female) are killed just as they are about to
give us the chance of obtaining an increase of the stock to the extent
say of thirty thousand, the ultimate effect must be to disturb and
cripple the producing powers of the shoal to such a degree that it will
break up and find a new breeding-ground, safe for a time perhaps from
the spoliation of the greedy fishermen. The Lochfyne commissioners give
as a reason for their non-recommendation of a close-time the fact, that
were there to be a cessation from labour, the enemies of the herring
would so increase, that the jubilee given would be nugatory. But surely
there is a great want of logic in this argument! How is it that a
close-time operates so favourably in the case of the salmon—not only a
seasonal close-time, but a weekly one as well? Would not the herring,
with its almost miraculous breeding-power, increase in the same ratio,
or even in a greater ratio than its enemies, especially if, as the
commissioners tell us and we believe, it is engaged in multiplying its
kind during ten months of the year? Are not the enemies of the herring
at work during the fishing season as well as at other periods? I could
understand the logic of denying a close-time on the ground that, as
the herring never ceases breeding, it is impossible to fix a correct
period. But, according to the deliverance made by the commissioners in
the natural history portion of their inquiry, a close-time is quite
possible. I have ever been of opinion, notwithstanding the practical
difficulties that would have to be encountered in carrying it out, that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account