The Hastings Road and the "Happy Springs of Tunbridge"Harper, Charles G. (Charles George)
History
The Hastings Road and the "Happy Springs of Tunbridge"
Harper, Charles G. (Charles George)
England -- Description and travel; England -- Social life and customs; Hastings Road
It was, in fact, the early silting up of this haven that led to the
utter obliteration of the original old town dependent upon it. When
the tide no longer flowed up to its ancient quays and wharves, their
use, of course, vanished, and they eventually disappeared. In those
long-departed days the Castle cliffs and a long reef of rocks extended
a considerable distance out to sea, and formed the natural protection
for this inlet; but in the course of centuries the sea made such
inroads that the protection at last disappeared, and the shingle, in
its easterly march, instead of being kept out in the Channel and on its
course, found entrance, and steadily, and by no means slowly, cut off
the haven from the outer waters.
Thus was the chief port of the famous Cinque Ports finally ruined
by the then irresistible forces of nature. Already, in 1205, it had
suffered political ruin; for, as the chief port in the intercourse
between England and Normandy, its trade became extinct on the severance
of the Dukedom of Normandy and the Kingdom of England, in the reign of
King John. Five years before even that event the port was far gone to
decay, for it could furnish but six of the twenty-one ships that in its
prime formed its contribution to the nation’s defence.
Apparently the inhabitants of the Hastings that bordered this haven
early realised its inevitable doom; and those of the neighbouring New
Burgh—the Old Town of our time—did not shift for themselves, to form a
harbour, until the reign of Queen Elizabeth. And even then they were
reduced to “sending round the hat” for contributions and donations from
more prosperous places. Pity the sorrows of a poor old port!
They were led to this course by the destruction of their old wooden
pier; but it was not until seventeen years had passed that sufficient
funds had been accumulated and a beginning was made in the spring of
1595. Even so, fate dealt hardly with the place; for although the new
pier was built “all of huge rocks, artificially pyled, edge-long, one
close by another,” so that it was considered highly permanent, it
needed only the first storm of the following winter to overthrow it.
Something daunted by this mischance, but not beaten, the Hastings
people built the pier anew, and of a different construction, with
“tymbor braces and barres, crosse dogges, and suchlike up to the top:
bowtyfull to behold,” and much else in that quaint way. Woe, woe! This
much-admired work had not stood a year when, like the earlier, it was
washed completely away. It happened on “All saints’ daie, 1597,” when
“appeared the mighty force of God, who, with the finger of his hand,
at one greate and exceeding high spring tyde, with a south-east wynd,
overthrew this huge worke in lesse than an hower, to the greate terrour
and abashment of all beholders.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account