The heart of Asia : $b A history of Russian Turkestan and the Central Asian Khanates from the earliest timesSkrine, Francis Henry
History
The heart of Asia : $b A history of Russian Turkestan and the Central Asian Khanates from the earliest times
Skrine, Francis Henry
Asia, Central -- History; Asia, Central -- Relations -- Russia; Russia -- Relations -- Asia, Central
Last winter a Russian peasant fell on the roadside in a state of
helpless intoxication near the Afghan frontier south of Merv; but the
Turkomans, so far from molesting him, covered him with carpets and
brought him on a camel before the district chief. Similar occurrences
are reported from Askabad.
“We may boast with perfect truth that the thirty-five years during
which Central Asia has enjoyed the blessings of a firm and civilised
rule have been years of sustained progress, of daily-increasing
strength in the bonds of attachment and goodwill which unite these
subject peoples to the inhabitants of other Russian provinces. As
compared with India, our territories in that part of the world are
still poor and sparsely populated; but there has been a considerable
increase in the country’s wealth since the conquest of Turkestān
in 1863. The trading classes are now the staunchest supporters of
our authority; next, the cultivators; lastly, the women. Should any
mischief arise, it will be due to the intrigues of the mullās, whose
powers for evil are great, owing to the ignorance rather than the
fanaticism of the population.
“The large measure of progress attained could not have been hoped
for did we not possess settled frontiers with which we are perfectly
content. Every country in Central Asia has had its period of war; but
it is the fixed policy of our Tsar to prevent a recurrence of its
horrors arising from our initiative. In the case of the territory most
recently acquired, the disturbances lasted for seven years--from 1878
to 1885. Between the latter year and 1888 we established a stable and
logical frontier with the aid of Great Britain; and in the twelve years
which have since elapsed there have been no expeditions throughout
its length of 600 miles bordering on Persia, and 400 on Afghanistān.
The latter country contains much inflammable material, but we have
taken every means in our power to ensure that the internal disorders
of that state shall not react on our frontier. So scrupulous is our
regard for the _status quo_, that whole tribes have cast themselves
on our protection in vain. The Piruzkuhis, Khezaris, and Jamshidis
have crossed our borders in troops of as many as 1000 families, but
we have always repatriated such refugees. There have been similar
cases in our dealings with Persian subjects. The whole population of
Khelat, in Khorāsān, came to us with entreaties to protect them against
the oppression of the Shāh’s officers. Our reply was the despatch of
troops who conducted them across the frontier, but we took diplomatic
steps to assure a pardon for those to whom we had been obliged to
refuse our protection. Turkestān proper has been free from war since
the occupation of Farghāna--twenty-one years ago. The Bokhārā frontier
has remained intact since the capture of Samarkand in 1868. It is true
that within the last few years the Pamirs Question has been reopened,
and slight modifications have been made in our boundaries towards
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account