The heart of Asia : $b A history of Russian Turkestan and the Central Asian Khanates from the earliest timesSkrine, Francis Henry
History
The heart of Asia : $b A history of Russian Turkestan and the Central Asian Khanates from the earliest times
Skrine, Francis Henry
Asia, Central -- History; Asia, Central -- Relations -- Russia; Russia -- Relations -- Asia, Central
[244] Cf. Vambéry, _Bokhara_, p. 81, and Bretschneider, _Mediæval
Researches from Eastern Asiatic Sources_ (London, 1888), vol. i. p. 236
_seqq_. An interesting article was published in 1874 by Grigorieff in
the _Memoirs of the Eastern Branch of the St. Petersburg Archæological
Society_, vol. xviii. p. 191 _seqq._ This article contains the
Turkish text of an extract from the _Tārīkh-i-Munajjim-Bāshī_, with
an introduction, a translation, and copious notes. The name of
Kara-Khānides was first suggested by Grigorieff for this dynasty, after
Satuk Kara Khān, who was the first of its kings to embrace Islām. The
title is more convenient than the others by which this dynasty has
been known, such as Uïghūrs, Ilek-khāns, and Ilkhāns, as will appear
from note below, p. 116. Bretschneider, whom on such subjects it is
hard to contradict, was by no means convinced by Grigorieff’s positive
assertion that the Kara-Khānides were not Uïghūrs.
[245] The passage from his famous history, the _Tārīkh-i-Jahān-Kushāy_,
dealing at great length with the Uïghūrs, has been translated by
d’Ohsson. Cf. _Histoire des Mongols_, vol. i. p. 430 _et seq._
[246] Narshakhi (ed. Schefer, p. 233) calls this dynasty of “Turkish
Khāns” the “house of Afrāsiyāb.” Afrāsiyāb is one of the most prominent
figures in Firdawsi’s great epic of kings, the _Shāh Namé_. B.C. 700 is
given as a conjectural date of the first migration of the Turks across
the Oxus--as far as India and Asia Minor. According to the coins, it
appears that the Turks (under what name it is not known) entered the
Greek kingdom of Bactria. Cf. Reinaud, _Rélations de l’Empire, Rom.
avec l’Asie Centrale_ (Paris, 1863), p. 227. Tradition has it that
Afrāsiyāb flourished about B.C. 580. He was the emperor of Tūrān, of
which Turkestān was a province, and was the great foe of Īrān. During
his reign Siyāwush, son of the emperor of Īrān, Kay-Kā´ūs, having
incurred his father’s displeasure, fled across the Oxus, which formed
the boundary between the two kingdoms, to Afrāsiyāb, who held court at
Rāmtīn. Siyāwush received Afrāsiyāb’s daughter Ferengis in marriage,
with the provinces of Khotan and Chīn as her dowry. Afrāsiyāb’s brother
Gersīwaz, jealous of the strangers growing power, set his brother’s
mind against Siyāwush, and induced him to take the field against his
son-in-law, who was captured and conveyed to Rāmtīn and there put to
death. Siyāwush left a posthumous son by Ferengis, named Kay-Khosrū,
who became emperor of Īrān. Kay-Khosrū, bent on avenging his father’s
death, besieged Rāmtīn, drove Afrāsiyāb out of his country, and
occupied it for seven years; Afrāsiyāb afterwards returned and
recovered his capital, but was finally defeated and slain. Kay-Khosrū
now became master of Samarkand and Bokhārā; but, wishing to devote his
days to religious contemplation, resigned his government to Lohrāsp,
the son-in-law of Kay-Kā´ūs, who soon exacted homage from the rulers of
Tartary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account