The heart of Asia : $b A history of Russian Turkestan and the Central Asian Khanates from the earliest timesSkrine, Francis Henry
History
The heart of Asia : $b A history of Russian Turkestan and the Central Asian Khanates from the earliest times
Skrine, Francis Henry
Asia, Central -- History; Asia, Central -- Relations -- Russia; Russia -- Relations -- Asia, Central
political movements of foreign courts and armies. He himself despatched
travellers to various parts, who were ordered to lay before him the
maps and descriptions of other foreign countries” (Wolff’s _Bokhara_,
p. 243).
[411] Shāh Rukh was Tīmūr’s favourite son. He derived his name, which
means “King and Castle,” from a well-known move in chess, which royal
game was one of Tīmūr’s few amusements (Wolff’s _Bokhara_, p. 244).
[412] Cf. Price’s _Mohammedan History_, iii. 492, quoting the
_Khulāsat-ul-Akhbār_. As a fact, Pīr Mohammad only obtained the
government of Balkh, and was murdered in Kandahār in A.H. 809 (1406).
Cf. De Guignes, v. 79.
[413] Cf. De Guignes, v. 81.
[414] De Guignes, v. 81. Khalīl spent some years in Moghūlistan, but,
unable to bear a longer separation from Shād Mulk, joined her in Herāt.
Shāh Rukh gave him the government of Khorāsān, and he died the same
year (A.H. 812).
[415] His astronomical tables are amongst the most accurate and
complete that come down to us from Eastern sources. They treat of the
measurement of time, the course of the planets, and of the position of
fixed stars. The best editions are those printed in Latin in 1642–48 by
an Oxford professor named Greaves, and reprinted in 1767. The remains
of his celebrated observatory still crown the hill known as Chupān Ata
in an eastern suburb of Samarkand.
[416] Shāh Rukh’s authority, to judge by the coins which have come down
to us, extended nearly as far as his more celebrated father’s. We have
his superscription on the issues of mints as widely distant as Shīrāz,
Kaswīn, Sabzawār, Herāt, Kum, Shuster, and Astarābād.
[417] Vambéry’s _Bokhara_, p. 223.
[418] _Ibid._ p. 244.
[419] The young prince was born in 1483, the son of `Omar Shaykh
Mīrzā, whom he succeeded in the sovereignty of the eastern portion of
Tīmūr’s dominions. His conquest of India, and foundation of the Moghul
dynasty of Delhi, do not come within the scope of this work. He was
equally great in war, administration, and literature: perhaps the most
remarkable figure of his age.
[420] A.H. 903 (1497).
[421] An excellent table, showing the ramifications of the Tīmūrides,
will be found in vol. vii. of the _Mohammedan Coins of the British
Museum_.
[422] In the case of possessive pronouns and verbal inflexions, for
example, we find direct and obvious imitations of the Turkish grammar.
[423] The “Great Caan” of Marco Polo.
[424] Cf. Bretschneider, _op. cit._ ii. pp. 139, 140.
[425] Cf. Bretschneider, _loc. cit._
[426] _Idem._ Tūkā Tīmūr, from whom sprang the Khāns of the Crimea,
was the youngest son of Jūjī. Cf. Lane-Poole’s _Mohammedan Dynasties_,
p. 233. Tokhtamish, the inveterate foe of Tamerlane, belonged to the
Crimean branch of the Khāns of Dasht-i-Kipchāk. The Khānate of Kazan
was founded in 1439, on the remains of the Bulgarian Empire, by Ulugh
Mohammed of the same line.
[427] Bretschneider, _loc. cit._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account