The heart of Asia : $b A history of Russian Turkestan and the Central Asian Khanates from the earliest timesSkrine, Francis Henry
History
The heart of Asia : $b A history of Russian Turkestan and the Central Asian Khanates from the earliest times
Skrine, Francis Henry
Asia, Central -- History; Asia, Central -- Relations -- Russia; Russia -- Relations -- Asia, Central
This apparent self-abnegation was probably due to the universal
respect enjoyed by the house of Chaghatāy as descendants of Chingiz,
and to the associations which clustered round their name. Be this as
it may, it is certain that Tīmūr was content with the absolute power
won by his genius, and scorned the sounding style of emperor. That
his rule made for the happiness of the peoples who owned his sway is
evidenced by the hold which his personality had, and still retains,
on the fickle population of Central Asia. “The love and attachment of
the army to Tīmūr,” writes Wolff,[408] “was so great and so unlimited
that they would forego plunder in time of need if ordered by him; and
the subjection to him was so blind and unconditional that it would
only have cost him an order to cause himself to be proclaimed not
only as emperor, but even as Prophet of the Tartars. He endeavoured
to soften the inclination to cruelty of his soldiers, composed of so
many nations, by poets and learned men, by musicians and _sufis_, who
came in swarms to the army and wandered with him through Asia.”[409]
Under his enlightened rule Samarkand became the centre of a great
and brilliant court, and was embellished with palaces, mosques, and
colleges which extort the admiration of those who view them in their
decay.
[Illustration: DERVISHES OF THE NAKSHABANDI ORDER]
It is the hard fate of a conqueror that he can never pause in his
onward progress. The fierce passions let loose by war can be assuaged
only by their repeated exercise; and Tīmūr’s hordes were ever
clamouring to be led to fresh victories. Thus, when he had restored
peace and prosperity to Central Asia, he set out on a triumphant march
which threatened to include the whole inhabited world. In A.H. 793
(1390) Persia and the Caucasus, that halting-place in the migration
of human masses westwards, were overrun by his armies. Then, in
A.H. 798 (1395), he attacked the Kipchāks, a Mongolian tribe firmly
settled in South-Eastern Russia and the lower Volga, which for the
first time in history were united under their great chief, Tokhtamish
Khān. Long and desperate was the struggle between the rivals, but it
ended in Tīmūr’s triumph. His eyes now turned to India, whose fabulous
wealth had attracted other adventurers such as he. The Panjāb and the
whole Gangetic Delta fell an easy prey to his legions; and in A.H.
801 (1398) he returned to Samarkand laden with spoils. The Egyptian
dynasty established in Syria and the Turkish lords of Asia Minor alone
retained their independence. Tīmūr stormed Damascus and broke the
Mamlūk power. Then, on the field of Angora, A.H. 805 (1402), he utterly
defeated the Sultan Bāyazīd I., a conqueror of a renown only second to
his own. Constantinople and the empire of the East lay at his mercy.
Happily for European civilisation, his darling Samarkand attracted the
war-spent conqueror. He returned thither in triumph, and three years
later died at Otrār, while on his way to subdue China, A.H. 807
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account