The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
The State railways of Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Belgium, Denmark,
and the Anglo-Saxon republics of South Africa and Australasia are
absolutely free from unjust discrimination. There are no complaints or
suspicions on that score. Shippers know to a certainty that their rivals
are paying the same charges that they are. Even the most strenuous
opponents of public railways do not accuse them of favoritism. The
railways privately operated in Holland, Denmark, Sweden and Norway, are
also free from discrimination. Thorough public control, natural honesty,
and lack of overwhelming temptation have combined to produce a pure
administration. In Prussia, the Government, strong as it was, did not
succeed in preventing discrimination on the private railways. President
A. T. Hadley, of Yale, says: “Where the system of granting special rates
becomes deeply rooted a great many are given without any principle at
all, through the caprice or favoritism of the railroad companies and
their agents.” The revelations made before the Hepburn Committee, as to
the practice of railroads in the matter of secret rates were simply
appalling. This is the most indefensible part of the whole system of
railroad management. It is characteristic that Bismarck, who always
chose his fighting ground with skill, made this a main base of
operations in his contest against private railroad policy in Prussia.
The Prussian Cabinet in the argument for the nationalization of the
railways submitted to the Parliament in 1879 made the following
statement:
“The principles of the publicity of the rates and the equal treatment of
all shippers which are embodied in the railroad legislation of all
countries, are liable, as experience has shown, to be circumvented on
account of the competing interests of the railroads, and also by
individual interests which have influence with the managements. The
granting of these secret advantages in transportation in the most
diversified ways to individual shippers, and in particular the so-called
rebate system, is the most injurious misuse of the powers granted to
railroad corporations. It renders government control of rates
impossible, makes the competition between the different lines, as well
as that of the shippers dependent on them, dishonorable and unfair,
carries corruption among the railroad employés, and leads more and more
to the subordination of the railroad management to the special interests
of certain powerful cliques. It is the duty of the government to oppose
this evil, to uphold the principle of the equal treatment of all
shippers, and to enforce the legislative regulations on this subject.
The importance of this problem is only equalled by the difficulty of its
solution.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account