The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
President Hadley says: “What the United States needs is an act under
which the Commission will take part in the making of tariffs and give
effect to the public interest in the general questions of railroad
management, leaving the specific cases of violation to be stopped or
punished by the courts.” Very good. But how is the Commission to take
part in the making of tariffs? If it is to do any more than to give
advice (the efficacy of which is nil when it comes up against the Beef
Trust, Standard Oil, or other big private interest), it must have
authority, general or particular, to fix rates when the railways do not
make them just and reasonable. In England Parliament fixes maximum rates
on the basis of Board of Trade studies, and the commission acts as a
court. The plan has not prevented either discrimination or extortion,
but has taken the life out of the railways to a large extent. In this
country it is proposed to try the plan of letting a public board fix
individual maximum rates when injustice is shown. As there is an appeal
to the Federal courts and as Hadley declares that the courts insist on
retrying questions in their entirety, it would seem that the very system
President Hadley advocates would really come into being under the
Hepburn Bill,—the Commission will have a part in fixing the rates, and
violations of law will really be determined by the courts.
INDEX
[References are to pages.]
A
ACWORTH, W. M., Appendix B.
ALABAMA MIDLAND CASE, 95.
ARMOUR CAR-LINES, 151, 174–207.
mileage, 175, 188, 190.
speed of cars, 177, 178.
passes, 180.
exclusive contracts, 177, 180, 182, 190.
icing charges, 181–186, 194–196.
espionage, 185.
fixing rates, 186–189.
lax inspection, 188–189.
low minimum carload, 189.
rebates and profits, 190, 191, 194.
cipher code, 197.
AUSTRIA, 315.
B
BACON, E. P.,
testimony, 111.
BAKER, RAY STANNARD,
on Beef Trust, 153.
BALTIMORE,
discriminated against, 226.
BARBED WIRE CASE, 88.
BASING-POINT SYSTEM, 98, 208 _et seq._
BEEF,
billed for export, 225.
BEEF TRUST. (See ARMOUR.)
controls rates, 152.
runs private cars, 176.
intimidates roads, 177.
discriminations, advantages, etc., 176–207.
shipments of, 179.
favored by rates, 186–187.
Boston books destroyed, 250.
packer and road director, 76.
BELGIUM, 315.
BIDDLE OF SANTA FE,
testimony, 114, 124 _et seq._
in salt case, 169.
BISMARCK, 316.
BLANCHARD, GEORGE R.,
quoted, 107.
on ticket scalping, 20.
“BLIND BILLING,”
Standard’s cars, 75.
BOOKS DESTROYED, 248–250.
BOSTON & ALBANY, 105–107.
BOWIE COMPRESS, 68.
BRICK CASE,
New Jersey to North Carolina, 157.
BROKERS, TICKETS, 20.
C
CALEDONIAN COAL CO., 126–129.
CALIFORNIA FRUIT TRANS. CO., 180.
CAMDEN IRON WORKS,
rebates, 122.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account