The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
A big capitalist in the West got hold of great oil fields on the Pacific
slope, wonderful prospects, contracts to supply big cities, etc. Some
one told him he had better see the railroads before he made his
contracts. He thought the transportation question would be all right and
went ahead. When he got his contracts made and wanted to ship the oil,
he asked for cars, and then he found the transportation question was not
all right. He could not get the cars.
Sometimes a railroad has arbitrarily refused to haul goods to certain
consignees. A case of this kind came before the Texas Railway Commission
in the case of the Independent Compress _v._ Chicago, Rock Island and
Texas Railway Company. The Bowie Compress, located at the same station
with the Independent, had some sort of pull which caused the railroad to
refuse to haul cotton to that station unless consigned to the Bowie
Compress. The railway also allowed compression charges out of the
through rate on cotton shipped to the Bowie Compress, refused freight
from points of origin, and reshipped the cotton from the Bowie press at
through rates, while refusing such concessions to others.[85]
The refusal to deliver at a certain place may be as effective sometimes
as the refusal to deliver at all. When in 1890 Mr. Nelson Morris tried
to establish competitive stock yards in Chicago to get rid of the graft
of the Union Stock Yards owned largely by railway interests, the
Vanderbilts being in the lead, his enterprise was loudly applauded by
the stock raisers of the West; but the railroads made short work of
Morris. They simply refused to deliver to his yards the cars shipped
there. They did not recognize any such place as the Morris yards and
calmly hauled all cars to the old terminal. If Mr. Morris wanted them he
must come and get them and pay switching charges. This ruined the
venture.
Big shippers may be given an undue advantage by excessive difference
between the rates on carloads and less than carloads.[86] On June 29,
1898, the Western railroads advanced their less-than-carload rates to
the Pacific Coast to a minimum difference of 50 cents a cwt. above the
carload rate; and “on a great many commodities the difference is greater
than the profit on the goods.”[87] The Interstate Commission regards a
moderate reduction on carload shipments as fair, but will not sanction
lower rates for cargo or train-load quantities than for carloads.[88]
CHAPTER XI.
CLASSIFICATION AND COMMODITY RATES.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account