The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
Railroad ties have been charged a higher rate than lumber. A high rate
on railroad ties prevents their being shipped and depreciates their
value at home, so that the discriminating company is able to buy them at
a low price.
The Union Pacific years ago made prohibitory rates on steel rails in
order to hinder or prevent the construction of a road that promised to
become a competitor of one of the Union Pacific’s connecting lines.
Prohibitory rates on rails, ties, etc., have often been maintained to
obstruct the building of competing lines, and to render them more
costly.
CHAPTER XII.
OIL AND BEEF.
Oil in Standard hands continued to receive favorable attention from the
railroads throughout the middle period. The Combine was preferred by an
“unreasonable mileage” payment of ¾ of a cent a mile on its tank cars,
loaded or empty,[95] while others who attempted to ship in tank cars had
to pay mileage to the railroads for the return of their empties; by
practically compelling independents to ship in barrels, and charging for
the weight of the barrel; and by making an arbitrary allowance of 42
gallons for leakage on tank shipments with no allowance for waste in
barrel shipments.[96]
The Commission held it unjust to allow for leakage on tank shipments and
not on barrel shipments; that the weight of the barrel must not be
charged for if the weight of the tank is not, the same quantity of oil
must have the same rate no matter what the package might be, unless the
shippers were offered facilities for shipment by tank as well as barrels
so that the option was theirs. The representative of the oil combination
was questioned by the Interstate Commerce Commissioners, in relation to
the mileage, etc.
“Are you allowed mileage on tank cars?”
“No, sir.”
“Neither way?”
“Neither way.”
But the railroad officials in this case refused to commit oil-perjury.
Asked what mileage they paid the Combine they replied: “Three-quarters
of a cent a mile.”
When Rice asked what the railroads would charge him for bringing back
his empty cars if he shipped in tanks, he was told he would have to pay
1½ cents or more a mile. He found that if he tried to sell his oil in
California it would cost him $95 to get the empty tank car back, while
the railroads paid the Standard for the privilege of hauling its empties
back. Rice saw that from the South he could get return loads of
turpentine, but the railroads absolutely refused to give him rates.[97]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account