The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
The Texas Railway Commission in 1897 started suits against several
railways for discriminations, and before the end of the year three
railways pleaded guilty in 95 cases and paid fines amounting to $47,500,
promising to “be good.” The next year $20,000 more were paid by the
railways as fines in 20 cases for violation of this law in Texas. Many
other cases pending.[156] In the 1898 Report the Commission says that
express and railway agents do a business as shippers of fruit, etc., and
discriminate against the business of other shippers by underbilling
their own shipments and by delaying the other shipments.
One of the most striking illustrations of the effectiveness of the
Interstate Act is to be found in the results of the Boston and Albany
investigation in 1900, during the consideration of the question of
leasing the road to the New York Central. The Interstate Act made it a
misdemeanor to depart from the published rates, but the railroad
followed the law only when it was convenient to do so, and most of the
rates in actual use constituted misdemeanors.
“Various shippers, merchants, manufacturers, etc., were visited, and it
was found that the local rates were not followed, that shippers were
receiving widely varying discounts from the published rates, and that
shippers did not know at all what rates their competitors and neighbors
were getting. They were not satisfied with the system, but they were
afraid to complain, for if they made complaint they would lose whatever
advantages they possess and become marked men for railway persecution.
The Railroad Commission of Massachusetts advertised for shippers who
were not satisfied to come and make complaint; but they did not do so,
for the reason that any shipper who complained of a railroad would be
apt to fare a good deal worse afterwards than before; his goods would be
delayed, his facilities would be cut off and whatever reductions he was
getting would be stopped, and he would have to pay the full published
rates. He might also be involved in costly litigation, and he did not
dare to say anything.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account