The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
The Caledonian sought other markets, but found itself handicapped by
discriminating freight rates. Coal from the Colorado Fuel Company’s
mines at Trinidad and at Gallup was being supplied at a price which just
about equalled the freight rate alone from the point of production to
destination. For example, the rate on lump coal from Gallup to Las
Cruces was $5.65, and the coal was selling at the mine for $1.60 to
$2.50 per ton; yet Gallup lump coal from the Colorado Fuel Company’s
mines was being sold in Las Cruces for $5.65 a ton, exactly what the
rival company, the Caledonian, would have to pay in freight. The
Caledonian shipped coal to Silver City, N. M., paying the published
rate, $5.90 a ton, while the Colorado Company was able to deliver Gallup
coal at Silver City at $5.75 total for freight and cost of coal. This
was in April, 1900. Later, the Caledonian shipped to Silver City at a
rate of $5.75 per ton, just what the Colorado sold for, freight and all.
As Gallup, Silver City, and Las Cruces are all in New Mexico, the
Interstate Act does not apply to traffic between those points; but “Mr.
Bowie (manager of the Caledonian) testified that he had made many
shipments from Gallup to El Paso, Tex., upon which he paid the published
rate, and that he found the same competitive conditions at El Paso and
at points in Arizona and Mexico which existed at Silver City.”[182]
The result was that the Caledonian and other mines were practically
driven from the market, their business brought to a standstill, and the
Colorado Fuel Company obtained a virtual monopoly of the trade that
should have been divided with these companies.
Before the Senate Committee, 1905, in answer to a question by Senator
Kean about the so-called discriminations in the matter of the Colorado
Fuel and Iron Company and the Santa Fe Railroad, Mr. Hearne of the
Colorado Fuel Company said: “This matter has been brought about largely
by sensational newspapers.... The coal produced by the Gallup people is
inferior,[183] carrying not more than half the heating power of our
high-grade bituminous. If the railroads have not extended to them the
same rate they have extended to us, I presume it is because the people
at Deming and El Paso, etc., do not want that fuel at any price.”[184]
In other words, the Gallup coal was so poor that the people at Deming
did not want it anyway, and so the railroad put a prohibitive rate on it
to keep the people at Deming from buying it instead of the far superior
Colorado coal which the people were determined to buy anyway.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account