The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
This is stronger than the impression I received, which was that
discriminations did exist and it was not thought possible that they
should cease to exist, so long as competition continues, but that there
was an earnest purpose to eliminate them so far as possible.
Notwithstanding the Colorado Case and others mentioned hereafter I still
think that the present administration of the Santa Fe is on the whole
relatively very honest and very admirable.[195]
President Roosevelt was led to a similar conclusion by the frank and
manly stand taken by Paul Morton in his testimony in the Dressed-meat
Hearings, Jan. 7, 1902. In a letter to Mr. Morton, June 12, 1905, the
President says: “At the time when you gave this testimony the Interstate
Commerce Law in the matter of rebates was practically a dead letter.
Every railroad man admitted privately that he paid no heed whatever to
it, and the Interstate Commerce Commission had shown itself absolutely
powerless to secure this heed. When I took up the matter and endeavored
to enforce obedience to the law on the part of the railroads in the
question of rebates, I encountered violent opposition from the great
bulk of the railroad men and a refusal by all of those to whom I spoke
to testify in public to the very state of affairs which they freely
admitted to me in private. You alone stated that you would do all in
your power to break up this system of giving rebates.” It was this, the
President says, that led him to invite Mr. Morton to take a place in the
Cabinet.
The high character and ability of Mr. Morton and President Ripley and
the fact that the Santa Fe management seems to represent high-water mark
in railroad honesty, gives great importance to the Santa Fe cases, and
the attitude of her leading officers towards the law, and the principle
of impartial treatment of shippers.
Paul Morton is reported to have said to a representative of the Chicago
_Daily News_, December 31, 1904: “What Mr. Biddle did was exactly right,
in my judgment, and if I had been in his place I should have done the
same thing.” And President Ripley is stated to have said to a reporter
for the _Inter-Ocean_, “It was not rebating. It was simply a figure
agreed upon by private contract. Mr. Paul Morton was cognizant of it,
and though his name may not be affixed to the order, he was the man from
whom Mr. Biddle, the freight traffic manager, got authority to haul coal
for the Colorado Fuel and Iron Company on the terms named.”
“Did you also know of it, Mr. Ripley?”
“Why, yes, as I know of all of our business. I consider it absolutely
legitimate, and will do it again to-morrow if I like.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account