The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
“SENATOR KEAN. How long ago was that?
“MR. DAVIES. A year or two ago. It is done to-day.
“SENATOR KEAN. Do you have knowledge of it?
“MR. DAVIES. Yes; and so can you, if you go around the freight yards.
“SENATOR KEAN. Is this knowledge of yours a guilty knowledge?
“MR. DAVIES. I just a moment ago told you not, and further, I will offer
to this committee the records of my business.
“SENATOR KEAN. But you say you know these things are being done and have
made no complaint.
“MR. DAVIES. Haven’t I? I would like to show you these papers that have
been nursed by the Interstate Commerce Commission for a year.”
Mr. Prouty of the Interstate Commerce Commission says:[207] “I knew some
years ago that a train-load of wheat was transported from Minneapolis to
Chicago for nothing. There was simply no record of that shipment on the
books of the railroad.”
“SENATOR CULLOM. What object had they in doing that?
“MR. PROUTY. They wanted to prefer that man that had the wheat. Instead
of paying a rebate they carried the shipment for nothing.”
The power to give or withhold the milling-in-transit privilege is a
serious means of discrimination. The Pennsylvania Railroad, for example,
grants this privilege to mills west of Pittsburg, but denies it to
millers at Harrisburg.[208] The Commission decided that the allowance of
the privilege of milling-in-transit by a carrier to shippers in one
section must be without wrongful prejudice to the rights of shippers in
another section served by its line. But the evidence in this case was
too meagre and incomplete to enable the Commission to make any order in
the premises involving the general extension of milling-in-transit
privileges into a territory where such privileges had not been
previously allowed.
By refusing to accord the milling-in-transit privilege[209] to some when
it is granted to others the railroads may crush a mill more effectively
than it could be done by a hail storm in which each hailstone weighed a
ton. The big Atlantic Flour Mill at Beach and Green Streets,
Philadelphia, was rendered useless by the Pennsylvania Railroad’s
refusal to extend to it the milling-in-transit privileges enjoyed by
other Philadelphia mills.[210]
Western roads give saw-mills operating on their lines and having logging
roads an allowance of 2 to 4 cents per hundred lbs. on the through
rates. Roads east of the Mississippi decline to make any such allowance,
so that the Western mills enjoy an advantage of 60 cents to $1.80 per
1000 feet in the through freight rates.[211]
CHAPTER XXI.
MIDNIGHT TARIFFS AND ELEVATOR FEES.
“Midnight tariffs” or “flying tariffs,” changed while you wait,[212] are
used to give rebates and preferences all wool and a yard wide, strictly
gilt-edged and in accord with the statutes made and provided for the
publication and observance of schedule rates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive