The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
Early this year, 1905, the South Side Elevated road of Chicago wanted
400 carloads of ties. The blanket rate on ties from the entire yellow
pine belt to Chicago is 26 cents per hundred lbs. On shipments
originating between Luzon, La., and Pearl, Miss., the Illinois Central
made a special tariff (March 22 and April 6, 1905), fixing the rate on
ties at 26 cents per tie, each tie to be billed at 130 lbs. This was
equivalent to a reduction of the rate to 20 cents per hundred lbs., and
no shipper outside of the favored region could compete in the Chicago
market. It is suspected that the party who got the Elevated contract
knew beforehand that the railroad would issue this special tariff, and
was therefore able to underbid competitors in perfect safety.[221]
A rate of 90 cents a ton is charged on coal for a special use such as
railroad supply, while the same coal must pay $1.85 between the same
points if intended for manufacturing or other industrial domestic
use.[222]
It is unjust discrimination to charge more for carrying cattle and hogs
than for carrying packing-house products, and the desire of the carrier
to get more business by so doing is no excuse.[223]
The railroads have carried dressed meats from Omaha to Chicago at 18½
cents, while charging 23½ cents on live-stock from Iowa points nearer
Chicago. The packer could buy the cattle at Fort Dodge, Iowa, ship them
to Omaha, kill them and ship the dressed carcasses to Chicago, cheaper
than the live-stock owner at Fort Dodge could ship the cattle to
Chicago. Some years ago on arbitration, Mr. Fink and Judge Cooley being
the arbitrators, it was decided that the fair ratio between live-stock
and dressed meats from Chicago to New York would be 26 cents per hundred
for live cattle, and 45 cents for the dressed carcass. But the railroads
have reversed this relation, although the Interstate Commerce Commission
has decided that the rate on dressed meats should be higher than on
live-stock.[224]
Recently, January 1905,[225] the Commission has reaffirmed its decision
of 1890 and held that it is unlawful to charge more for transporting
live-stock from Missouri River points and St. Paul to Chicago than for
carrying packing-house products between the same points, but the Beef
Trust cares nothing for the opinions of Judge Cooley nor for the orders
of the Interstate Commerce Commission, and the Trust controls the
railroads.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account