The Heavens Above: A Popular Handbook of AstronomyRolfe, W. J. (William James)
Science
The Heavens Above: A Popular Handbook of Astronomy
Rolfe, W. J. (William James)
Astronomy
290. _Recognition of a Telescopic Comet._--It is impossible to
distinguish telescopic comets by their appearance from another class of
heavenly bodies known as _nebulæ_. Such comets can be recognized only by
their motion. Thus, in Fig. 322, the upper and lower bodies look exactly
alike; but the upper one is found to remain stationary, while the lower
one moves across the field of view. The upper one is thus shown to be a
nebula, and the lower one a comet.
[Illustration: Fig. 322.]
291. _Orbits of Comets._--All comets are found to move in _very
eccentric ellipses_, in _parabolas_, or in _hyperbolas_.
Since an ellipse is a _closed_ curve (48), all comets that move in
ellipses, no matter how eccentric, are permanent members of the solar
system, and will return to the sun at intervals of greater or less
length, according to the size of the ellipses and the rate of the
comet's motion.
Parabolas and hyperbolas being _open_ curves (48), comets that move in
either of these orbits are only temporary members of our solar system.
After passing the sun, they move off into space, never to return, unless
deflected hither by the action of some heavenly body which they pass in
their journey.
[Illustration: Fig. 323.]
Since a comet is visible only while it is near the sun, it is
impossible to tell, by the form of the portion of the orbit which it
describes during the period of its visibility, whether it is a part
of a very elongated ellipse, a parabola, or a hyperbola. Thus in
Fig. 323 are shown two orbits, one of which is a very elongated
ellipse, and the other a parabola. The part _ab_, in each case, is
the portion of the orbit described by the comet during its
visibility. While describing the dotted portions of the orbit, the
comet is invisible. Now it is impossible to distinguish the form of
the visible portion in the two orbits. The same would be true were
one of the orbits a hyperbola.
Whether a comet will describe an ellipse, a parabola, or a
hyperbola, can be determined only by its _velocity_, taken in
connection with its _distance from the sun_. Were a comet ninety-two
and a half million miles from the sun, moving away from the sun at
the rate of twenty-six miles a second, it would have just the
velocity necessary to describe a _parabola_. Were it moving with a
greater velocity, it would necessarily describe a _hyperbola_, and,
with a less velocity, an _ellipse_. So, at any distance from the
sun, there is a certain velocity which would cause a comet to
describe a parabola; while a greater velocity would cause it to
describe a hyperbola, and a less velocity to describe an ellipse. If
the comet is moving in an ellipse, the less its velocity, the less
the eccentricity of its orbit: hence, in order to determine the form
of the orbit of any comet, it is only necessary to ascertain its
distance from the sun, and its velocity at any given time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account