The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United StatesEarly, Jubal Anderson
History
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States
Early, Jubal Anderson
Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
It was in fact not a question of construction of the clause in the
Kansas-Nebraska bill but of the Constitution itself. If Congress had no
power to legislate on the subject, then it could delegate none, and if
there was such a thing as "squatter sovereignty" it extended to all other
subjects as well as to slavery, and the settlers in the territories
might set up for themselves without any authority from Congress, which
would involve some very extraordinary consequences, including that even
of disposing of the public lands. The squatter sovereignty view of the
question was one not to be tolerated; and it applied to the Utah and New
Mexico bills as well as to that in regard to Kansas and Nebraska.
The great mass of Southern Whigs agreed with the Southern Democrats in
their way of interpreting the principle, but they did not regard the
question as one of sufficient practical importance to make a fight over,
and old party divisions and feuds prevented a coalescence of all of the
Southern men.
Though considered by many an abstract question, as it certainly was so far
as it applied to Kansas and Nebraska, it seemed to divide the Democratic
party into two wings, a Northern and a Southern one, with some adherents
to either wing from the opposite section. This division resulted in the
nomination of two sets of candidates by the Democratic party--Douglas of
Illinois and Johnson of Georgia by the Northern wing, and Breckenridge of
Kentucky and Lane of Oregon by the Southern wing. The Republican free-soil
or abolition party nominated Lincoln of Illinois and Hamlin of Maine,
while the Southern Whigs and a remnant of Northern Whigs, who had not
fused with the free-soilers and abolitionists, nominated Bell of Tennessee
and Everett of Massachusetts. The advocates of this latter ticket proposed
to sink every other issue and stand for "The Union, the Constitution, and
the enforcement of the Laws."
At the election in 1860, Lincoln and Hamlin received the majority of the
popular vote in nearly all of the Northern states and by that vote alone
secured a majority of the votes of the electoral colleges, but they lacked
very nearly 1,000,000 votes of receiving a majority of the combined
popular vote of the United States. In this election the Southern people
were unanimous in their opposition to Lincoln and Hamlin though divided as
to the other candidates, the few thousands of votes given on the border
for the Republican ticket, being given by Northern men who had emigrated
across the line, and amounting to a very inconsiderable fraction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account