The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United StatesEarly, Jubal Anderson
History
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States
Early, Jubal Anderson
Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
It would be hard to conceive language more forcible for defining the
right of the states to withdraw and the wrong and criminality of the
attempt to coerce them when they had exercised that right, than this of
Mr. Greeley's. It derives additional force as coming from him, when it
is recollected that he had ever been inimical to the institutions of the
South, and it announced principles which had been previously asserted
in all questions of the Union, and underlay the whole superstructure of
a government which itself was founded on the right of revolution. It is
difficult to realize the fact that the man who uttered language like
that quoted, subsequently became one of the most strenuous advocates of
the war of coercion, which was waged on the Southern states. Mr. Greeley
cannot avoid the effect of his statement of the principles asserted in
his article, by contending that the act of separation was not "the echo
of an unmistakeable popular fiat," and that the Southern people were
precipitated into secession without due deliberation.
When the right to discuss, deliberate and decide, exists, those possessing
it, must necessarily be the sole judges of how it is to be exercised.
The Southern states did deliberate and did decide that they could no
longer remain in the Union with safety, and therefore they determined to
withdraw from it. If the Southern people had been hurried into secession
by their leaders, they are the parties to complain and to hold the guilty
ones responsible. They have not done so, and what right had Mr. Greeley
and his party to become their champions against their wishes? He and his
party are estopped from denying that the Southern people, did with almost
entire unanimity, adopt secession and willingly gave their support to the
cause of separation; for since their country was overrun by a superior
military force, their state governments overthrown; military despotisms
established over them; and in the effort to reconstruct the Union, the
great mass of the people disfranchised, and the right of suffrage given
to the freed slaves, because it was alleged that the Southern people were
still rebellious, and so wedded to the idea of secession, notwithstanding
the bitter experience of the war, that they could not be trusted with the
right to vote and hold office. All of this was done with Mr. Greeley's
full knowledge and sanction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account