The Hero of Esthonia and Other Studies in the Romantic Literature of That CountryKirby, W. F. (William Forsell)
History
The Hero of Esthonia and Other Studies in the Romantic Literature of That Country
Kirby, W. F. (William Forsell)
Estonian literature; Estonian literature -- History and criticism
When the man came back with the pole, he mended the sledge and
harnessed the horse again. "Oho! now we'll drive on." But alas! the
horse would not move. Then the man looked at the red scamp, the grey
rascal, and the brown villain, and said angrily, "Give me my horse
back." But the wild beasts answered, "You killed it yourself, while we
were running about looking for wood by your orders."
Thus they stood quarrelling and disputing, till Reynard considered how
he could best put an end to the dispute and save his own skin. He
knew[Pg 281] of a pit in the neighbourhood which the hunter had dug for
a wolf-trap, and covered loosely with thin twigs. "The matter won't be
settled by quarrelsome and angry words," cried he; "but come, let the
four of us go to the wolf-pit; we will all tread on it at once, and
whoever falls in shall be adjudged guilty." The rest agreed, and when
they stood on the twigs, they broke under their weight, and
precipitated them into the pit, and even Reynard was unable to escape.
He had trusted too much to the lightness of his tread, and had trodden
on the twigs without consideration. Now they were all in the trap
together, and none of them could hope to escape. The time seemed long
to them, and their hunger soon became too great to bear.
First of all, the wild beasts attacked the man of the bast shoes and
devoured him, and then Reynard had to resign his life. Last of all the
bear throttled the wolf. Then came the hunter and gave the bear his
quietus. Thus all the four rascals experienced the truth of the
proverb, "As the deed, so the reward."
[Pg 282]
WHY THE DOG AND CAT AND THE CAT AND MOUSE ARE ENEMIES.
In former days all animals dwelt together in peace; but then it befell
that the dogs killed and devoured hares and other game in the open
fields. The other animals complained, and when God called the dogs to
account, they objected that they had nothing to eat. Their plea was
admitted, and leave was granted them to eat fallen animals. The dogs
requested and received a written license to that effect, which was
intrusted to the sheep-dog, as the largest and most reliable among
them. But in autumn the sheep-dog was very busy, and could neither
carry it about with him nor find a dry place for it, so he intrusted it
to the care of his friend the tom-cat, who had always a safe room, or
sat on the stove. The cat arched his back, and rubbed it against his
friend's foot, as a promise of fidelity, and the document was laid on
the stove, where it was supposed to be safe.
One day the dogs found a pony in the wood which had fallen, so they
fell upon it, and killed and devoured it. The animals complained
again,[Pg 283] and the dogs were pronounced guilty; but they appealed
to the license, in which it was not stated whether the fallen animals
should be dead or alive. When the sheep-dog and the cat sought for the
document, they could not find it, for the mice had nibbled it away.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account