She knew what Potter was doing; remembered those talks with him, his
enthusiasm, his awakening to patriotism--and she, too, was a patriot. That
work of his must have been of value; he must have achieved much to demand
attention from her father and his companions. She was conscious of a glow
of pride, and then was furious with herself for feeling pride. What
interest had she in Potter Waite--and if she had an interest in him, or in
any honest man, what could come of it? There was another decision she had
reached: That she could be wife to no honest American. She, the daughter
of a traitor, could make no honorable man the father of the grandchildren
of a traitor. She had thought of those children--and of their shame, and
of generations of shame that would follow them. The stigma would follow
from mother to children to children's children. Nearly a hundred and fifty
years had passed since Benedict Arnold sought to betray his country, and
his name was remembered, his treachery recalled, where noble men and noble
acts had been forgotten. No children of hers should feel the shame that
would be their birthright because the blood of Herman von Essen was in
their veins. Such a conclusion is a terrible thing for a girl like
Hildegarde, vivid with life, entering womanhood, ripe for love and
marriage! But it was there, weighing her, overshadowing her, choking her
with its noose of blackness.
Her duty was plain--her duty to her country and to decent citizenship; but
opposing it was the demand of blood. To give her father over to the law
was unthinkable. Had it been thinkable she doubted if she had evidence
which would stand the test--her unsupported word.... But she could not see
that crime committed, which it lay in her power to avert, and continue to
live.... It would make her a party to the crime, an abettor of murder....
She could give warning; she _must_ give warning--but how or to whom? How,
without betraying her father?
There was but one answer that she could see--to go herself to Potter
Waite, to warn him, to beg him to ask no questions as to the source of her
information, to trust to his honor and his chivalry. She was confident she
could trust him. In that moment she laid aside the pretense that she
despised him--but she did not admit that she loved him. She saw him as a
man, an American gentleman, trustworthy, brave, dependable. She rested
herself on that quality of dependability; felt she could trust herself to
it utterly. She could give warning; put him on his guard, frustrate the
plotters--and escape from the complexity without betraying the secret she
must not betray.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account