[250] Woepcke, loc. cit., pp. 462, 262.
[251] Woepcke, loc. cit., p. 240. _[H.]is[=a]b-al-[.G]ob[=a]r_, by an
anonymous author, probably Ab[=u] Sahl Dunash ibn Tamim, is given by
Steinschneider, "Die Mathematik bei den Juden," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_,
1896, p. 26.
[252] Steinschneider in the _Abhandlungen_, Vol. III, p. 110.
[253] See his _Grammaire arabe_, Vol. I, Paris, 1810, plate VIII; Gerhardt,
_Etudes_, pp. 9-11, and _Entstehung_ etc., p. 8; I. F. Weidler,
_Spicilegium observationum ad historiam notarum numeralium pertinentium_,
Wittenberg, 1755, speaks of the "figura cifrarum Saracenicarum" as being
different from that of the "characterum Boethianorum," which are similar to
the "vulgar" or common numerals; see also Humboldt, loc. cit.
[254] Gerhardt mentions it in his _Entstehung_ etc., p. 8; Woepcke,
_Propagation_, states that these numerals were used not for calculation,
but very much as we use Roman numerals. These superposed dots are found
with both forms of numerals (_Propagation_, pp. 244-246).
[255] Gerhardt (_Etudes_, p. 9) from a manuscript in the Bibliotheque
Nationale. The numeral forms are [symbols], 20 being indicated by [symbol
with dot] and 200 by [symbol with 2 dots]. This scheme of zero dots was
also adopted by the Byzantine Greeks, for a manuscript of Planudes in the
Bibliotheque Nationale has numbers like [pi alpha with 4 dots] for
8,100,000,000. See Gerhardt, _Etudes_, p. 19. Pihan, _Expose_ etc., p. 208,
gives two forms, Asiatic and Maghrebian, of "Ghob[=a]r" numerals.
[256] See Chap. IV.
[257] Possibly as early as the third century A.D., but probably of the
eighth or ninth. See Cantor, I (3), p. 598.
[258] Ascribed by the Arabic writer to India.
[259] See Woepcke's description of a manuscript in the Chasles library,
"Recherches sur l'histoire des sciences mathematiques chez les orientaux,"
_Journal Asiatique_, IV (5), 1859, p. 358, note.
[260] P. 56.
[261] Reinaud, _Memoire sur l'Inde_, p. 399. In the fourteenth century one
Sih[=a]b al-D[=i]n wrote a work on which, a scholiast to the Bodleian
manuscript remarks: "The science is called Algobar because the inventor had
the habit of writing the figures on a tablet covered with sand." [Gerhardt,
_Etudes, _p. 11, note.]
[262] Gerhardt, _Entstehung _etc., p. 20.
[263] H. Suter, "Das Rechenbuch des Ab[=u] Zakar[=i]j[=a]
el-[H.]a[s.][s.][=a]r," _Bibliotheca Mathematica_, Vol. II (3), p. 15.
[264] A. Devoulx, "Les chiffres arabes," _Revue Africaine_, Vol. XVI, pp.
455-458.
[265] _Kit[=a]b al-Fihrist_, G. Fluegel, Leipzig, Vol. I, 1871, and Vol. II,
1872. This work was published after Professor Fluegel's death by J. Roediger
and A. Mueller. The first volume contains the Arabic text and the second
volume contains critical notes upon it.
[266] Like those of line 5 in the illustration on page 69.
[267] Woepcke, _Recherches sur l'histoire des sciences mathematiques chez
les orientaux_, loc. cit.; _Propagation, _p. 57.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account