[75] Pandit Bhagav[=a]nl[=a]l Indr[=a]j[=i], "On Ancient N[=a]g[=a]ri Numeration; from an Inscription at N[=a]negh[=a]t," _Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society_, 1876, Vol. XII, p. 404. [76] Ib., p. 405. He gives also a plate and an interpretation of each numeral. [77] These may be compared with Buehler's drawings, loc. cit.; with Bayley, loc. cit., p. 337 and plates; and with Bayley's article in the _Encyclopaedia Britannica_, 9th ed., art. "Numerals." [78] E. Senart, "The Inscriptions in the Caves at Nasik," _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. VIII, pp. 59-96; "The Inscriptions in the Cave at Karle," _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. VII, pp. 47-74; Buehler, _Palaeographie_, Tafel IX. [79] See Fleet, loc. cit. See also T. Benfey, _Sanskrit Grammar_, London, 1863, p. 217; M. R. Kale, _Higher Sanskrit Grammar_, 2d ed., Bombay, 1898, p. 110, and other authorities as cited. [80] Kharo[s.][t.]h[=i] numerals, A['s]oka inscriptions, c. 250 B.C. Senart, _Notes d'epigraphie indienne_. Given by Buehler, loc. cit., Tafel I. [81] Same, ['S]aka inscriptions, probably of the first century B.C. Senart, loc. cit.; Buehler, loc. cit. [82] Br[=a]hm[=i] numerals, A['s]oka inscriptions, c. 250 B.C. _Indian Antiquary_, Vol. VI, p. 155 seq. [83] Same, N[=a]n[=a] Gh[=a]t inscriptions, c. 150 B.C. Bhagav[=a]nl[=a]l Indr[=a]j[=i], _On Ancient N[=a]gar[=i] Numeration_, loc. cit. Copied from a squeeze of the original. [84] Same, Nasik inscription, c. 100 B.C. Burgess, _Archeological Survey Report, Western India_; Senart, _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. VII, pp. 47-79, and Vol. VIII, pp. 59-96. [85] K[s.]atrapa coins, c. 200 A.D. _Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society_, 1890, p. 639. [86] Ku[s.]ana inscriptions, c. 150 A.D. _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. I, p. 381, and Vol. II, p. 201. [87] Gupta Inscriptions, c. 300 A.D. to 450 A.D. Fleet, loc. cit., Vol. III. [88] Valhab[=i], c. 600 A.D. _Corpus_, Vol. III. [89] Bendall's Table of Numerals, in _Cat. Sansk. Budd. MSS._, British Museum. [90] _Indian Antiquary_, Vol. XIII, 120; _Epigraphia Indica_, Vol. III, 127 ff. [91] Fleet, loc. cit. [92] Bayley, loc. cit., p. 335. [93] From a copper plate of 493 A.D., found at K[=a]r[=i]tal[=a][=i], Central India. [Fleet, loc. cit., Plate XVI.] It should be stated, however, that many of these copper plates, being deeds of property, have forged dates so as to give the appearance of antiquity of title. On the other hand, as Colebrooke long ago pointed out, a successful forgery has to imitate the writing of the period in question, so that it becomes evidence well worth considering, as shown in Chapter III. [94] From a copper plate of 510 A.D., found at Majhgaw[=a]in, Central India. [Fleet, loc. cit., Plate XIV.] [95] From an inscription of 588 A.D., found at B[=o]dh-Gay[=a], Bengal Presidency. [Fleet, loc. cit., Plate XXIV.] [96] From a copper plate of 571 A.D., found at M[=a]liy[=a], Bombay Presidency. [Fleet, loc. cit., Plate XXIV.]