The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 01 : $b Prolegomena; Egypt, Mesopotamia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 01 : $b Prolegomena; Egypt, Mesopotamia
World history
Shashanq III reigned fifty-two years altogether. Then came his son
Pamai, who reigned at least two years, and his grandson Shashanq IV,
who reigned at least thirty-seven years, until about 735 B.C. We
only know of these kings by their being mentioned on several of the
monuments to the honour of the Apis bulls which died in their reigns.
So their supremacy must at least have been recognised for a time in
Memphis. But their dominion must have been limited to the province of
Busiris. King Piankhi of Ethiopia mentions in his great inscription a
grand-duke of the Ma, Shashanq of Busiris, and his successor Pamai,
who, presumably, were identical with Shashanq III and Pamai. At the
time of this conqueror, about 775 B.C., we find near them a king
Nimrod of Hermopolis, a ruler Peftotbast of Heracleopolis Magna, who
bore the king’s ring, a king Auputh of the Delta cities Tentremu and
Ta-an, and a king Uasarken (III) of Bubastis. The latter probably
belongs to the Manethan XXIIIrd Dynasty which came from Tanis, and,
according to Africanus, ascended the throne about 823 B.C. Manetho
mentions Petasebast as its founder, and he was succeeded by Uasarken,
who is presumably the aforementioned Uasarken III. Manetho evidently
did not regard the last rulers of the XXIInd Dynasty as legitimate, so,
although they are mentioned, they are not included in the chronology.
By the side of these “kings” there are, moreover, numerous princes
(_Ur_) of the Ma, designated in other cases as lords (_rpa_) or
nomarchs (_ha_). Independent rulers in the few provinces of the Delta,
in Athribis, Mendes, Sebennytus, Saïs, etc., and the provost of
Letopolis bore the title of high priest.
These leading men came mostly from the leaders of the mercenaries, and
their possessions and power constantly tottered. It is very possible
that the single states formed a slack political confederation, and
it is probable that the descendants of the old ruling house were
recognised as the chief feudal lords, while those rulers who usurped
the title of king laid claim to complete independence.
THE ETHIOPIAN CONQUEST
[Sidenote: [_ca._ 1000-775 B.C.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account