The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
Saul blamed his daughter for having helped David out of his
difficulties, and said to Jonathan: “As long as the son of Jesse
liveth, thou shalt not be established nor thy kingdom.” Then he held
a strict trial of the priests, under the tamarisk at Gibeah. When the
priests of Nob were brought before him, Saul asked Ahimelech: “Why have
ye conspired against me, thou and the son of Jesse, that he should
rise against me? Thou shalt surely die. Slay the priests,” he cried to
his bodyguard; “their hand is with David and because they knew when he
fled and did not shew it to me.” But the servants of the king would
not put forth their hand to fall upon the priests of the Lord. And the
king said to Doeg, “Turn thou and fall upon the priests.” And Doeg
the Edomite turned and fell upon the priests, and slew on that day
fourscore and five persons that did wear a linen ephod.
“And Nob, the city of the priests, smote he with the edge of the sword,
both men and women, children and sucklings, and oxen, and asses, and
sheep, with the edge of the sword.
“And one of the sons of Ahimelech the son of Ahitub, named Abiathar,
escaped and fled after David. And Abiathar shewed David that Saul had
slain the Lord’s priests.”
DAVID IN REVOLT AGAINST SAUL
We do not know exactly how far Saul’s suspicion of David was justified:
from the story which has been revised and worked up with a view to
prejudicing us in David’s favour, we can only perceive that the son of
Jesse actually was in close alliance with the priests, and David’s own
actions after he had broken with Saul are evidence of far-reaching
and carefully laid schemes, the means of whose execution were not too
scrupulous. But whether Saul had perceived David’s ambitious intentions
in good time, or had gone too far in his proceedings against him, in
either case he had committed an error: David was by no means content
with escaping from the king’s anger; if wrong had been done him he far
outdid it by his own acts. The Philistines would neither have received
in Gath a dangerous enemy like David, who had done them so much injury,
nor have spared his life, if he had not agreed to support them for
the future in their struggle against Saul. David also entered into
relations with other enemies of his country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account