The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
Thus the Ark of God was fetched in solemn procession and in the
presence of the whole people from Baal Jehuda [Bible, Baalah
(Kirjath-jearim) in Judah] where it stood in the house of a private
individual. But an accident which befell the driver of the cart upon
which it was carried, perplexed David. The fancy he had thought
dispelled, that Jehovah’s hand of blessing was withdrawn from the ark,
now appeared to be founded on the truth. He did not venture to conduct
it to Zion. It was only when even a foreigner, Obed Edom of Gath, in
whose house the Ark had been left for three months, derived blessing
from it, that David carried out his intention. With rejoicing and
the sound of trumpet, the people led Jehovah to Zion. David himself
executed the motions of dancing before the Ark, clad in the linen
garment of a priest, and fulfilled as chief the priestly office before
Jehovah in Zion. Michal, Saul’s proud daughter, was ashamed of her
husband for degrading himself before his serving men and maids. David
was proud of having been honoured before Jehovah. There was in him a
truly religious nature, which did not scruple to go even to the verge
of what were, even for that age, religious eccentricities.
It must be in the highest degree astonishing that David built no temple
for the Ark. If he fetched it to his capital and his palace, he must
also have meant to erect there a fitting resting-place for Jehovah.
Since he did not do so, he must have been guided by special reasons
and considerations. If, as the history of Samuel hints, the Ark had
already a temple of its own in Shiloh, it can be positively said that
only a divine oracle could have withheld David from building a fitting
temple. Without such a definite declaration of Jehovah’s will, it would
have been culpable indifference and criminal contempt for the Majesty
of Jehovah for David to have built no temple. There is consequently no
real grounds to discredit as a late invention the tradition of David’s
firm intention to build Jehovah a temple on Zion and its prevention
by a prophetic saying. The rather late compilation of the writings
concerning it cannot be taken into consideration, in face of such
overwhelming inherent grounds for the truth of the fact. Nay, it is
believeable that already on this occasion a prophetic saying furnished
David with the prospect of the continuance of his dynasty.
FURTHER WARS BREAK OUT
[Sidenote: [_ca._ 990-980 B.C.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account