The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
The change, however, could only have worked beneficially if in
the meantime the binding of the tribes of Israel to the house of
David could really have been effected. Even David had not entirely
accomplished this task, so difficult under existing conditions. The
northern tribes and Benjamin always eyed his rule with distrust. Still
less was Solomon equal to the task. It was impossible that his despotic
inclinations, and especially the severe pressure of the taxes, could
serve to make the tribes forget that only a short time ago, not birth,
but the people’s will, had raised the king to his throne.
How far the ferment had gone in the northern tribes, even in Solomon’s
own day, we see clearly enough from the circumstance that the rebellion
broke out during his life-time. It was only by force that it was
suppressed, and the secession of the northern tribes from Solomon was
averted. It was Jeroboam, one of the overseers of the king’s workmen,
who had prepared it. He was compelled to flee to Egypt, and was there,
as it seems, received with open arms. But Solomon’s rule was strong
enough to make it impossible for him and his to think of a repetition
of the rising, so long as Solomon possessed the throne. It may excite
surprise that an Israelite rebel should have received protection in
Egypt whose Pharaoh was the father of one of Solomon’s wives. The
explanation is to be found in the fact that Shishak, the Egyptian
Shashanq I, was the founder of a new dynasty and consequently knew not
Solomon.
[Sidenote: [_ca._ 930 B.C.]]
After Solomon’s death, which we may place about the year 930 B.C., the
succession of his son Rehoboam at first appeared to be a matter of
course. What it was which secured to him the precedence over Solomon’s
other sons we do not know. As a fact he seems to have mounted the
throne and occupied it for a time. But the seething discontent with
Solomon’s government which the northern tribes had so long restrained,
broke out, if not immediately on his accession, at any rate soon after.
There may have been many negotiations and attempts to smooth things
over, until finally Rehoboam determined himself to make terms with the
discontented in Shechem. Meanwhile Jeroboam had also had time to return
from Egypt, and take the guidance of the movement into his own hand.[b]
[Illustration: EXTERIOR OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE, JERUSALEM]
CHAPTER VII. DECAY AND CAPTIVITY
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account