The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
These facts, which the Bible does not mention, are contained in two
Assyrian inscriptions, one of which is found on the obelisk of Nimrud,
and the other on a tablet in the British Museum. In these inscriptions
Jehu is called the son of Omri, which proves that the Syrians knew
little about the genealogy of the kings of Israel. A bas-relief on
the Nimrud obelisk represents persons of Jewish or Aramæan types,
wearing turbans with pointed tops, bringing presents, and one of them
is prostrating himself before Shalmaneser. It is supposed that this
bas-relief, twice repeated, represents the submission of Hazael and
Jehu. If Jehu, in declaring himself vassal to the king of Assyria,
hoped for protection against Hazael, he was mistaken. Shalmaneser did
not intervene in the quarrels of his vassals and Jehu left his son
Jehoahaz a weakened and mutilated kingdom in 815 B.C.
[Sidenote: [_ca._ 815-780 B.C.]]
Hazael, and his son, Ben-Hadad III, who succeeded him, reduced the
Israelite army to ten thousand footmen, fifty horsemen, and ten
chariots. Israel did not begin to recover itself until the reign of the
son of Jehoahaz, named Joash like the king of Judah; the two kingdoms
of the north and south were once more governed by kings of the same
name. At Jerusalem the priests, who had governed without control since
Athaliah’s death, appropriated to themselves the revenues destined for
the maintenance of the temple. At the end of twenty-three years, as
these repairs were not made, Jehoash, who was then thirty, wished to
put an end to this scandal and withdrew from them the free disposal of
money. The discontent of the priests only broke out after Jehoiada’s
death, perhaps because thenceforth Jehoash took less caution. According
to the Book of Chronicles, he had the son of his benefactor, who was
remonstrating with him, stoned by the people, and it is to avenge
this death that he was assassinated on his return from a war with the
Syrians, in which he was wounded. The Book of Kings does not mention
this war, and on the contrary says that Jehoash diverted Hazael by
giving him the treasures of the temple. The Book of Kings does not
mention the murder of Jehoiada’s son, neither does it explain the
reason of Jehoash’s assassination. His son, Amaziah, succeeded him and
punished his murderers, “but the children of the murderers he slew
not,” which indicated an improvement in the ideas and morals of the
country (797 B.C.).
The kingdom of Israel, so weakened in the reigns of Jehu and Jehoahaz,
was raised by three victories of Jehoash over Ben-Hadad, son of Hazael.
It is said that they were predicted by Elisha on his death-bed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account