The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
Hoshea did not pay the annual tribute regularly, which the king of
Assyria had imposed upon him, either because his resources were
insufficient or because he counted on the assistance he had asked of
Egypt. Shalmaneser had him seized and put in prison, then attacked
Samaria, which resisted bravely, in vain awaiting help. The king of
Egypt did not wish to risk the chances of war for the support of a
lost cause. The king of Judah, Hezekiah, son of Ahaz, was afraid of
bringing wrath on his head and prudently stayed at home, occupying
himself solely in preparing a religious reform. The siege of Samaria
had already lasted ten years when Shalmaneser died. It was actively
carried on by his successor, who took the town and carried away its
inhabitants to Assyria and Media to the number of about twenty-seven
thousand, according to the inscription of Khorsabad. They were
gradually absorbed by the populations in the midst of which they had
been placed. The Israelites of the northern tribes transported by
Tiglathpileser, and those which Sargon had taken from Samaria, were
replaced by colonies taken from diverse provinces of the Assyrian
Empire, who likewise mingled with those who remained of the old
Israelite and Canaanite inhabitants. There arose a mixed race for
whom the Judeans always had a great aversion. These new Samaritans
had nevertheless adopted the worship of Jehovah without abandoning
the religion of the country they had left. Among the Israelites who
had been left in the country, there were great numbers who migrated
into the kingdom of Judah and even into Egypt. The prophets of Judah
have not a word of pity for their brethren of Israel. The author of
Chronicles does not mention the fall of Samaria. This event seems
to him less worthy of the attention of posterity than the details
of the ritual, the choirs of the Levites, the burnt offerings and
purifications. (722 B.C.)
The piety of Hezekiah is represented in the Book of Chronicles as
forming an absolute contrast to the impiety of his father Ahaz. The
changes he introduces into the national worship were far more serious
than those his father was accused of having made, only they conformed
to the interest of the sacerdotal caste. Ahaz had limited himself
to renewing parts of the accessories of the temple which dated from
Solomon’s time, and did not seem of such good taste to him, as what he
had seen in Damascus. Hezekiah destroyed all the high places in his
kingdom, that is to say, local sanctuaries, chapels, private altars,
groves, and all material symbols of religion, notably “the brazen
serpent that Moses had made: for unto those days the Children of Israel
did burn incense unto it: and he called it Nehushtan.” The temple of
Jerusalem thenceforth became the only sanctuary where sacrifices could
be made to the national God. The priests who offered sacrifices and the
Levites charged with the keeping of the temple, thus saw the increase
of their importance and their revenues.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account