The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
“About this time it was that King Antiochus, as he was going over the
upper countries, heard that there was a very rich city in Persia,
called Elymais; and therein a very rich temple of Diana, and that it
was full of all sorts of donations dedicated to it; as also weapons
and breast-plates, which, upon inquiry, he found had been left there
by Alexander, the son of Philip, king of Macedonia; and being incited
by these motives, he went in haste to Elymais, and assaulted it, and
besieged it. But as those that were in it were not terrified at his
assault, nor at his siege, but opposed him very courageously, he was
beaten off his hopes; for they drove him away from the city, and
went out and pursued after him, insomuch that he fled away as far as
Babylon, and lost a great many of his army; and when he was grieving
for this disappointment, some persons told him of the defeat of his
commanders whom he had left behind him to fight against Judea, and what
strength the Jews had already gotten. When this concern about these
affairs was added to the former, he was confounded, and, by the anxiety
he was in, fell into a distemper, which, as it lasted a great while,
and as his pains increased upon him, so he at length perceived he
should die in a little time; so he called his friends to him, and told
them that his distemper was severe upon him, and confessed withal, that
this calamity was sent upon him for the miseries he had brought upon
the Jewish nation, while he plundered their temple and contemned their
God; and when he had said this, he gave up the ghost. Whence one may
wonder at Polybius of Megalopolis, who, though otherwise a good man,
yet saith that ‘Antiochus died, because he had a purpose to plunder
the temple of Diana in Persia’; for the purposing to do a thing, but
not actually doing it, is not worthy of punishment. But if Polybius
could think that Antiochus thus lost his life on that account, it is
much more probable that this king died on account of his sacrilegious
plundering of the temple at Jerusalem. But we will not contend about
this matter with those who may think that the cause assigned by this
Polybius of Megalopolis is nearer the truth than that assigned by us.
“However, Antiochus, before he died, called for Philip, who was one
of his companions, and made him the guardian of his kingdom; and gave
him his diadem, and his garment, and his ring, and charged him to
carry them, and deliver them to his son Antiochus; and desired him
to take care of his education, and to preserve the kingdom for him.
This Antiochus died in the hundred forty and ninth year; but it was
Lysias that declared his death to the multitude, and appointed his son
Antiochus to be king (of whom at present he had the care), and called
him Eupator.
[Sidenote: [162-161 B.C.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account