The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
Israel represents that section of the Hebrew race which, on the one
hand, was most strongly influenced by Canaanite civilisation, and on
the other, had advanced farthest in religious development, and was most
largely permeated with foreign elements. Generally speaking, the other
nations of the same class are of purer Hebrew blood and have remained
partly nomadic, and therefore--with the exception of the Moabites--they
have remained more barbarous in a lower stage of development. In
the earliest times, more particularly, the differences between the
Israelites and the Hebrews proper were vague and undefined. Several
Hebrew clans found admittance into Judah, a tribe which is not even
mentioned among those of Israel in the Song of Deborah, and at that
time when Numbers xxv. 1-5 was composed, a licentious worship of Baal
of Peor was in vogue in that neighbourhood. But all the Old Testament
records prove that the Moabites worshipped one god only, the divinity
Chemosh. Hence, since such a narrative as the Yahvistic text is
absolutely trustworthy in such matters, we are forced to conclude that
it was Chemosh who was thus worshipped in that neighbourhood as the
Baal (_i.e._ Lord) of Peor. The conduct of the Moabite men and women is
in no way different from that of Israel of old in the lament of Hosea
iv. 13-15. That the Moabites, like the Israelites, gave their god the
name of Baal, _i.e._ Lord, may be deduced from the two Moabite local
names of Baal Meon and Bamoth Baal. It is therefore unnecessary to have
recourse to the theory that the phrase “Baal Peor” may have been coined
by the Israelites.
The language of the Moabites is merely a dialect of that in which
the Old Testament scriptures are written, and which we usually call
Hebrew, though Israelitish would be the better word. The affinity of
the two languages is not only evident from Moabitish proper names that
have come down to us; it is raised above the reach of doubt by Mesha’s
inscription. From this inscription it is plain that Moabitish presents
some points of contact with Arabic, a fact that can be explained by the
contiguity of the two languages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account