The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
The second Hebrew people with which we have to do, the Bene-Ammon,
the sons of Ammon or Ammonites, of whose putative descent from Lot’s
younger daughter we have already spoken, seems to have been a genuine
desert race. The land east of Jordan being occupied by Moab in the
south and Israel in the north, there certainly were but few districts
fit for tillage left for them. Nevertheless, attempts were not wanting
on their part to gain possession of the east side of Jordan.
The Edomites, the third of these Hebrew peoples, were those with
whom Israel came most into contact. The close relations and frequent
intermixtures which took place between Edomite and Israelite clans find
expression in the legend that makes Esau, the progenitor of the tribe,
the brother of Jacob and, like him, the son of Isaac of Beersheba. Esau
is really the name of a god, and we meet with it again in Phœnician
mythology in its Hellenised form of Usoos. The divine nature of Esau is
also betrayed in the fact that in the Elohistic text it is he, while
in the Yahvistic text, it is God, who meets Jacob at Penuel (Genesis
xxxii. 31, 33, _seq._). The name of this divinity was probably in old
times the name of the clan that worshipped him. At any rate, we never
meet with Esau as the collective name of this people; it is invariably
Edom. But Edom itself is the name of a half-forgotten god, as is
evident from the proper name Obed-Edom.
The Edomites were no more a nation of pure Hebrew blood than the
Israelites. They sprang from the fusion of Hebrew immigrants with
the population that already occupied the country, on the one hand,
and with Arab tribes, on the other. And these two elements which the
Edomite race absorbed must have retained their distinctive character
to a comparatively late period, for on no other supposition can we
explain the extent and definiteness of the information which has come
down to us on the subject. In the west, the Edomites spread from the
southern margin of the Dead Sea and from the Nachal ha ’Arabum (Brook
of the Arab Bushes, now the Wady Alachsi) to the Gulf of Akabah. In
the west and north they forfeited much of their nationality. For at
one time they occupied the whole of what was afterwards southern
Judah, though intermixed with Arab clans. The Edomites united with
Judah later--probably constrained to do so by their geographical
situation--and possessed the hegemony in the time of David. The capital
of this Edomite district was the ancient city of Hebron.
Its union with Judah was naturally accompanied by a corresponding
loss to Edom, which from that time forward passed for less powerful
than Israel in those parts, whereas, in earlier times, being united
under the rule of kings, it had been superior to the kingless state of
Israel, divided up into tribes, each eager in pursuit of its personal
ends. The national monarchy of Israel is no sooner consolidated than it
is strong enough to subdue Edom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account