The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
Joseph, Jacob, Isaac, and Abraham are heroes of the race, the first two
being at the same time tribal names. The last three have been revered
at celebrated sanctuaries; and it must not be overlooked that the
sanctuary of the first ancestor is the least important one. Moreover,
it is a fact, proved by the history of different sanctuaries of the
land, that those of Israel were considered sacred by the original
inhabitants. This is the case at Sichem and Gibeon; Bethel was likewise
a Canaanitish town in earlier times. Hebron was Edomitish, probably
in the first place Horitish, and the very name of Beersheba shows its
Canaanitish origin.
If the ancient Israelites took over the sanctuaries from the original
Canaanitish inhabitants, as we know definitely concerning some and
must surmise in the case of others, and if they nevertheless maintain
that these sanctuaries were founded by their fathers, the object of
this assertion is merely to gain a legal title to the possession of
these pre-Israelitic sacred spots, and to obliterate the fact of their
non-Israelitish origin. We shall have to go even farther and say that
the Israelites either adopted from the Canaanites the hero that was
honoured in those places, or that they there localised a certain
Hebraic hero. But in both cases there is no evidence of a pre-Egyptian
sojourn of Israelitish families in the land west of Jordan. Moreover,
the comparatively recent origin of the patriarchical tradition must be
borne in mind.
It is not quite so bad, though not essentially better, with the
question of the residence of Israel in Egypt before its migration to
the land east of Jordan. That, in spite of the most anxious search of
apologetic Egyptologists and theologians, no trace of Moses and the
Hebrews has been found in the Egyptian records is just as suspicious as
the fact that the Hebrew account says nothing about all that happened
between the time of Joseph and that of Moses.
It seems as if the flight of story-spinning imagination had been
sufficient to transpose both the historical personage of Moses and the
eponymous hero, Joseph, together with the eponyms of the two tribes
descended from him, to Egypt, but not to fill out the intervening
period. Egypt has, however, been too often for longer or shorter
periods the residence of Semitic families for one to dare to deny the
possibility that some Hebrew tribes or families stayed in Egypt. But
that the Hebrew people, to say nothing of the race of Israel, did not
do so, follows necessarily from the origin of these terms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account