The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 02 : $b Israel, India, Persia, Phoenicia, Minor Nations of Western Asia
World history
These desert tribes were the Amalekites, the Kenites, and the
Ishmaelites. Of the Kenites and their relations with the Amalekites and
Midianites we have already spoken. The Amalekites seem to have lived
in a state of open hostility to the Israelites, and to have harassed
them by predatory raids. Saul and David both fought against them.
One body of the Amalekites appears afterwards to have joined itself
to Edom; another to have been absorbed in Ephraim (Judges v. 14).
The Ishmaelites and Israelites may, on the other hand, have been on
friendly terms, although the divergence of their respective interests
would naturally make the ungovernable nomads, who acknowledged a
political authority, troublesome neighbours to husbandmen.
Thus the admirable description of her future son given by the angel of
the Lord to Hagar at the well of Lahai-roi in Genesis xvi. 12, “He will
be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand
against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren,”
is drawn straight from the life. The more friendly relations in which
Ishmael and Israel stand with one another finds expression in the
mythical genealogy which makes Ishmael half brother to Isaac and traces
his descent from Hagar, the Egyptian, Abraham’s concubine. Hagar is, of
course, the name of an Ishmaelite clan. We meet with another expression
of the same relation when Keturah is given to Abraham as a concubine.
This must likewise be understood as the name of an Ishmaelite clan.
This mode of expression took its rise in the holy places of Beersheba,
Beer-lahai-roi, and Hebron, which were probably visited by Israelites
and Ishmaelites alike. One proof that the _connubium_ existed between
Israelites and Ishmaelites is the fact that Abigail, a sister of David,
had an Ishmaelite husband, Ithra by name.
The name of Ishmaelite speedily disappears from history. We hear
nothing of any catastrophe that overwhelmed the nation, and
consequently it seems possible that Ishmael, like Israel, was in
historic times merely the name of a confederation of distinct tribes.
The confederation dissolved, and the name of Ishmael vanished with it,
as the name of Israel would have vanished after the catastrophe of
722 had it not acquired a spiritual significance which rendered its
transference to Judah possible. The post-Exilic Jews acquired the habit
of calling all Arabs by the name of Ishmael. From the Jews the name and
the idea passed over to the Arabs themselves. This explains why the
name of Ishmael has been made by Arab genealogists the basis of every
kind of speculation. The application of the term Ishmaelites to the
Mohammedans is also to be referred to Jewish usage.[e]
THE CONQUEST OF CANAAN
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account