The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 03 : $b Greece to the Peloponnesian War
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 03 : $b Greece to the Peloponnesian War
World history
Setting aside the Dorian claim as preposterous, we have nothing to do but
follow the epic tradition. The Homeric poems consistently assume that
prior to any Dorian occupation Argolis was inhabited by other peoples,
and notably by Achæans whose position is so commanding that the whole
body of Greeks before Troy usually go by their name. Their capital is
Mycenæ, and their monarch Agamemnon, King of Men; although we find them
also in Laconia under the rule of Menelaus. But the poet has other names,
hardly less famous, applied now to the people of Argolis and now to the
Greeks at large. One of these names (Ἀργεῖοι) is purely geographical,
whether it be restricted to the narrow Argolid district or extended
to the wider Argos, and has no special ethnological significance. But
the other (Δαναοί) belonged to a people distinct from and, according
to uniform tradition, more ancient than the Achæans. We find, then,
two races in Argolis before the Dorian migration, each famous in song
and story, and each so powerful that its name may stand for all the
inhabitants of Greece. The Achæans occupy Mycenæ, that is to say, the
northern mountain region of the district, while legend represents the
Danaans as inseparably connected with Argos and the sea-board, and
ascribes to them certain works of irrigation.
[Illustration: GALLERY IN THE WALL AROUND THE CITADEL OF TIRYNS]
Whatever interpretation be put upon the myth, it seems clear that Argos
could not feed its great cities without artificial irrigation, and
this it owed to Danaus and his fifty daughters, “who were condemned
perpetually to pour water in a tub full of holes,”--that is to say, into
irrigation ditches which the thirsty soil kept draining dry.
Now our study of the Mycenæan remains has already constrained us to
distinguish in the Argolid two strata of Mycenæan peoples, one of them
originally dwelling on dry land in sunken huts, the other occupying
pile settlements in lakes and swamps. And since tradition squares so
remarkably with the facts in evidence, may we not venture to identify the
marsh-folk with the Danaans and the landsmen with the Achæans?
But Achæans and Dorians were not alone in shaping and sharing Mycenæan
culture; they had their congeners in other regions. Foremost among these
were the Minyan founders of Orchomenos. As lake-dwellers and hydraulic
engineers they are assimilated to the Danaans, whose near kinsmen they
may have been, as the primitive islanders, whose abode we have found
copied in the stone vases, must have been related to them both. Tradition
has, in fact, preserved an account of the colonisation of Thera by a
people coming from Bœotia, although it is uncertain whether it refers
to the original occupation or to a settlement subsequent to the great
catastrophe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account