The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
Such then was the result throughout Greece when that long war, which had
been undertaken in the name of universal autonomy, was terminated by the
battle of Ægospotami. In place of imperial Athens was substituted, not
the promised autonomy, but yet more imperial Sparta. An awful picture
is given by the philo-Laconian Xenophon, in 399 B.C., of the ascendency
exercised throughout all the Grecian cities, not merely by the ephors and
the public officers, but even by the private citizens, of Sparta.
We have more than one picture of the Athenian empire in speeches made by
hostile orators who had every motive to work up the strongest antipathies
in the bosoms of their audience against it. We have the addresses of
the Corinthian envoys at Sparta when stimulating the Spartan allies to
the Peloponnesian War; that of the envoys from Mytilene delivered at
Olympia to the Spartan confederates, when the city had revolted from
Athens and stood in pressing need of support; the discourse of Brasidas
in the public assembly at Acanthus; and more than one speech also from
Hermocrates, impressing upon his Sicilian countrymen hatred as well as
fear of Athens. Whoever reads these discourses, will see that they dwell
almost exclusively on the great political wrong inherent in the very fact
of her empire, robbing so many Grecian communities of their legitimate
autonomy, over and above the tribute imposed. That Athens had thus
already enslaved many cities, and was only watching for opportunities
to enslave many more, is the theme upon which they expatiate. But of
practical grievances--of cruelty, oppression, spoliation, multiplied
exiles, etc., of high-handed wrong committed by individual Athenians--not
one word is spoken. Had there been the smallest pretext for introducing
such inflammatory topics, how much more impressive would have been the
appeal of Brasidas to the sympathies of the Acanthians! How vehement
would have been the denunciations of the Mytilenean envoys, in place of
the tame and almost apologetic language which we now read in Thucydides!
Athens extinguished the autonomy of her subject-allies, and punished
revolters with severity, sometimes even with cruelty. But as to other
points of wrong, the silence of accusers, such as those just noticed,
counts as a powerful exculpation.
[Sidenote: [405-403 B.C.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account