The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
Three great battles had been fought in little more than the space of a
month (July and August)--those of Corinth, Cnidus, and Coronea: the first
and third on land, the second at sea. In each of the two land-battles
the Lacedæmonians had gained a victory: they remained masters of the
field, and were solicited by the enemy to grant the burial-truce. But if
we inquire what results these victories had produced, the answer must be
that both were totally barren. Even the narrative of Xenophon, deeply
coloured as it is both by his sympathies and his antipathies, indicates
to us that the predominant impression carried off by every one from the
field of Coronea was that of the tremendous force and obstinacy of the
Theban hoplites--a foretaste of what was to come at Leuctra!
If the two land-victories of Sparta were barren of results, the case
was far otherwise with her naval defeat at Cnidus. That defeat was
pregnant with consequences following in rapid succession, and of the
most disastrous character. As with Athens at Ægospotami--the loss of
her fleet, serious as that was, served only as the signal for countless
following losses. Pharnabazus and Conon, with their victorious fleet,
sailed from island to island, and from one continental seaport to
another, in the Ægean, to expel the Lacedæmonian harmosts, and terminate
the empire of Sparta. So universal was the odium which it had inspired,
that the task was found easy beyond expectation. Conscious of their
unpopularity, the harmosts in almost all the towns, on both sides of
the Hellespont, deserted their posts and fled, on the mere news of the
battle of Cnidus. Everywhere Pharnabazus and Conon found themselves
received as liberators, and welcomed with presents of hospitality. They
pledged themselves not to introduce any foreign force or governor, nor
to fortify any separate citadel, but to guarantee to each city its own
genuine autonomy. This policy was adopted by Pharnabazus at the urgent
representation of Conon, who warned him that if he manifested any design
of reducing the cities to subjection, he would find them all his enemies;
that each of them severally would cost him a long siege; and that a
combination would ultimately be formed against him. Such liberal and
judicious ideas, when seen to be sincerely acted upon, produced a strong
feeling of friendship and even of gratitude, so that the Lacedæmonian
maritime empire was dissolved without a blow, by the almost spontaneous
movements of the cities themselves. Though the victorious fleet presented
itself in many different places, it was nowhere called upon to put down
resistance, or to undertake a single siege. Cos, Nisyrus, Teos, Chios,
Erythræ, Ephesus, Mytilene, Samos, all declared themselves independent,
under the protection of the new conquerors. Pharnabazus presently
disembarked at Ephesus and marched by land northward to his own satrapy,
leaving a fleet of forty triremes under the command of Conon.
[Sidenote: [394-393 B.C.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account