The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
But this partial success did not diminish the alarm with which the
Spartan government viewed the operations of Conon, who was proceeding
to restore the Athenian dominion on the coasts and in the islands of
the Ægean. It perceived that it was necessary to change its policy with
regard to the court of Persia, and for the present at least to drop
the design of conquest in Asia, and to confine itself to the object of
counteracting the efforts of the Athenians, and establishing its own
supremacy among the European Greeks. And it did not despair of making the
Persian court subservient to these ends. For this purpose Antalcidas, a
dexterous politician of Lysander’s school, was sent to Tiribazus, who was
now occupying the place of Tithraustes in Western Asia, to negotiate a
peace. His mission awakened the apprehensions of the hostile confederacy;
and envoys [including Conon] were sent from Athens, Bœotia, Corinth, and
Argos, to defeat his attempts, and to support the interests of the allies
at the satrap’s court. Antalcidas however made proposals highly agreeable
to Tiribazus, and accompanied them with arguments which convinced the
satrap that his master’s interest perfectly coincided with that of
Sparta. He renounced all claim on the part of his government to the Greek
cities in Asia, and was willing that they should remain subject to the
king’s authority. For the islands, and the other towns, he asked nothing
but independence. Thus, he observed, no motive for war between Greece and
Persia would be left. The king could gain nothing by it, and would have
no reason to fear either Athens or Sparta, so long as the other Greek
states remained independent. Tiribazus was perfectly satisfied, but had
not authority to close with these overtures, at least against the will of
the states which were at present in alliance with his master; and they
refused to accede to a treaty on these terms.
But, though the satrap did not venture openly to enter into alliance with
Sparta without his master’s consent, he did not scruple privately to
supply Antalcidas with money for the purpose of raising a navy to carry
on the war with the states which were still acknowledged as allies of
Persia: and having drawn Conon to Sardis, he threw him into prison, on
the pretext that he had abused his trust, and had employed the king’s
forces for the aggrandisement of Athens. He then repaired to court
to report his proceedings and to consult the royal pleasure. It was
perhaps rather through some court intrigue, or vague suspicion, than
a deliberate purpose of adopting a line of policy opposite to that of
Tiribazus, that Artaxerxes detained him at court, and sent Struthas down
to fill his place. Struthas had perhaps witnessed the Asiatic campaigns
of Agesilaus, and could not all at once get rid of the impression that
the Spartans were his master’s most formidable enemies. He therefore
immediately made known his intention of siding with the Athenians and
their allies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account