The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
“Thus at one blow Athens was again the ruling power in the Ægean Sea;
she could now take again in hand the trusteeship of the temple of Delos,
which she had lost for some years.
“At the same time the reorganisation of the Attic marine was begun.
That was strongly needful: since in the Corinthian War the material had
been rendered largely useless, and efforts at its repair had been very
insufficiently made. There existed well over one hundred triremes, but
most of them old and hardly seaworthy. The building of a great number of
new battleships was begun and pushed so skilfully that after the lapse of
twenty years (357-6) an array of 289 triremes remained in spite of the
great demands made on the Attic fleet. To cover these expenses and for
the payment of the costs of the war an extraordinary tax was levied on
the property in Attica.”
[Sidenote: [378-376 B.C.]]
Thus we find Athens again with an array of allies behind her. She no
longer has the prestige of old. The moneys that they entrust to her
are contributions (_syntaxeis_), and no longer tribute (_phoros_). So
jealous are they, indeed, of Athenian ambition that no citizen of Athens
may even acquire property among the allies. The very tablet on which
this treaty was carved is still in existence, though broken in a score
of fragments. The chief purpose of the league is, it states, to be one
of defence, a combination “to compel the Spartans to leave the Greeks
in peace and freedom with unviolated lands.” The chief agents in the
organisation of this confederacy and in the proselyting of allies were
the brilliant orator Callistratus, who has been called the Aristides of
the second confederacy, and the shrewd generals, Iphicrates, Chabrias,
and Timotheus, the worthy son of the great admiral, Conon. The chief
fault with the confederacy was that it bound Athens into an unnatural
alliance with Thebes, its inveterate enemy, who could serve little
further purpose than that of a ladder to be discarded as soon as it had
been climbed over. The war, therefore, becomes mainly a war between
Sparta and Athens, in which, as Holm[h] notes, “Athens played always the
rôle of the spectator who sits quiet, saving his strength in order to act
as peace-maker over both the antagonists.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account