The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
Thebans to be struck out of the roll, and proclaimed them excluded from
the treaty.
Such was the close of this memorable congress at Sparta in June 371 B.C.
Between the Spartans and the Athenians, and their respective allies,
peace was sworn. But the Thebans were excluded, and their deputies
returned home, (if we may believe Xenophon) discouraged and mournful.
Yet such a man as Epaminondas must have been well aware that neither his
claims nor his arguments would be admitted by Sparta. If, therefore, he
was disappointed with the result, this must be because he had counted
upon, but did not obtain, support from the Athenians or others.
ATHENS ABANDONS THEBES
The leaning of the Athenian deputies had been adverse rather than
favourable to Thebes throughout the congress. They were disinclined,
from their sympathies with the Platæans, to advocate the presidential
claims of Thebes, though on the whole it was to the political interest of
Athens that the Bœotian federation should be maintained, as a bulwark to
herself against Sparta. Yet the relations of Athens with Thebes, after
the congress as before it, were still those of friendship, nominal rather
than sincere. It was only with Sparta, and her allies, that Thebes was at
war, without a single ally attached to her. On the whole, Callistratus
and his colleagues had managed the interests of Athens in this congress
with great prudence and success. They had disengaged her from the
alliance with Thebes, which had been dictated seven years before by
common fear and dislike of Sparta, but which had no longer any adequate
motive to countervail the cost of continuing the war; at the same time
the disengagement had been accomplished without bad faith. The gains of
Athens, during the last seven years of war, had been considerable. She
had acquired a great naval power, and a body of maritime confederates;
while her enemies the Spartans had lost their naval power in the like
proportion. Athens was now the ascendant leader of maritime and insular
Greece, while Sparta still continued to be the leading power on land--but
only on land; and a tacit partnership was now established between the
two, each recognising the other in their respective halves of the
Hellenic hegemony. Moreover, Athens had the prudence to draw her stake,
and quit the game, when at the maximum of acquisitions, without taking
the risk of future contingencies.[e]
FOOTNOTES
[11] [That is, the organisation of a group of settlements into one city or
capital.]
[Illustration: GREEK SEALS]
CHAPTER XLV. THE DAY OF EPAMINONDAS
It was not a new enemy which Sparta had found, but rather an old one
which had come to new power, in the city of Thebes. In that city an
extraordinary man had come to light, and by his sole influence he raised
his people to the head of Grecian affairs. This man was Epaminondas,
certainly one of the greatest men--some would have it even the very
greatest--that Greece ever produced.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account