The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
Disposed as the Arcadians showed themselves no longer to admit the
superiority of Thebes, their strength, their discipline, and their
successful activity in arms, though exerted in the cause of the
confederacy, could scarcely fail to excite some jealousy and apprehension
in the Theban government. No direct breach ensued, but friendship
cooled and became precarious. Meanwhile the new energy of the Arcadian
government attracted the regard of the humble and oppressed; always
an extensive description of men, and sometimes of states, among the
Grecian republics. The people of Elis had long claimed, and generally
maintained, a sovereignty over the people of several towns of Elis, and
of the whole district called Triphylia, on the border against Messenia.
In a strong situation in Triphylia, called Lasion, to assist in curbing
the inhabitants they had allowed some Arcadian exiles to establish
themselves. They at length made common cause with their neighbouring
fellow-subjects, particularly the Marganeans and Scilluntines, in
opposition to the Elean government. For support then they turned their
view to the new union of Arcadia: they claimed to be Arcadians; and by
a petition addressed to the new united government they desired to be
taken under its protection. At the same time the Eleans were pressing for
assistance from their allies of Arcadia, to recover their former dominion
over the towns which the Lacedæmonians had restored to independency. The
Arcadians slighted this application, and declared by a public resolution
that the petition of the Triphylians was well founded, and that their
kinsmen should be free. Elis became in consequence still more alienated
from Arcadia than Arcadia from Thebes.
The growing schism in the opposing confederacy promised great
advantage to Lacedæmon. Meanwhile, though, through vices in their
civil constitution and ill-management in their administration, the
Lacedæmonians had lost the best half of their territory, their
negotiations abroad still carried weight, and were conducted ably and
successfully. It was at this critical time that Philiscus, a Greek of
Abydos, arrived as minister from the satrap of Bithynia, Ariobarzanes,
professedly charged to mediate in the king of Persia’s name a general
peace among the Grecian republics. This new interference of Persia in
Grecian affairs was produced by Lacedæmonian intrigue. Philiscus proposed
a congress at Delphi; and deputies from Thebes and from the states of the
Theban confederacy readily met deputies from Lacedæmon there. No fear
of Persia, so the historian, not their friend, testifies, influenced
the Thebans; for Philiscus requiring, as an indispensable article, that
Messenia should return under obedience to Lacedæmon, they positively
refused peace but upon condition that Messenia should be free.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account