The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
The profession of sophist had not long flourished, and no Athenian had
acquired fame in any branch of philosophy, when the singular talents,
and singular manners and pursuits, of Socrates, son of Sophroniscus,
engaged public attention. The father was a statuary, and is not mentioned
as very eminent in his profession; but, as a man, he seems to have
been respected among the most eminent of the commonwealth: he lived
in particular intimacy with Lysimachus, son of the great Aristides.
Socrates, inheriting a very scanty fortune, had a mind wholly intent upon
the acquisition and communication of knowledge. The sublime principles of
theology, taught by Anaxagoras, made an early impression upon his mind.
They led him to consider what should be the duty owed by man to such a
Being as Anaxagoras described his Creator; and it struck him that, if the
providence of God interfered in the government of this world, the duty of
man to man, little considered by poets or priests as any way connected
with religion, and hitherto almost totally neglected by philosophers,
must be a principal branch of the duty of man to God. It struck him
further that, with the gross defects which he saw in the religion, the
morality, and the governments of Greece, though the favourite inquiries
of the philosophers, concerning the nature of the Deity, the formation
of the world, the laws of the heavenly bodies, might, while they amused,
perhaps also enlarge and improve the minds of a few speculative men, yet
the investigation of the social duties was infinitely more important,
and might be infinitely more useful, to mankind in general. Endowed by
nature with a most discriminating mind, and a singularly ready eloquence,
he directed his utmost attention to that investigation; and when, by
reflection, assisted and proved by conversation among the sophists and
other able men, he had decided an opinion, he communicated it, not in the
way of precept, which the fate of Anaxagoras had shown hazardous, but
by proposing a question, and, in the course of interrogatory argument,
leading his hearers to the just conclusion.
We are informed by his disciple Xenophon how he passed his time. He was
always in public. Early in the morning he went to the walks and the
gymnasia: when the agora filled, he was there; and, in the afternoon,
wherever he could find most company. Generally he was the principal
speaker. The liveliness of his manner made his conversation amusing
as well as instructive, and he denied its advantages to nobody. But
he was nevertheless a most patient hearer; and preferred being the
hearer whenever others were present able and disposed to give valuable
information to the company. He did not commonly refuse invitations,
frequently received, to private entertainments; but he would undertake no
private instruction, nor could any solicitation induce him to relieve his
poverty by accepting, like the sophists and rhetoricians, a reward for
what he gave in public.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account