The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 05 : $b the Roman Republic
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 05 : $b the Roman Republic
World history
Thus Tarquinius became hated by all that was good and noble amongst the
houses, as well as by the commons; and both orders cordially joined to
effect his overthrow. But the evil of his tyranny survived him; it was
not so easy to restore what he had destroyed as to expel him and his
family; the commons no longer stood beside the patricians as an equal
order, free, wealthy, well armed, and well organised; they were now poor,
ill armed, and with no bonds of union; they therefore naturally sank
beneath the power of the nobility, and the revolution which drove out the
Tarquins established at Rome not a free commonwealth, but on the other
hand an exclusive and tyrannical aristocracy.
THE WEALTH OF THE ROMANS AND ITS SOURCES
Niebuhr[c] has almost exhausted the subject of the Roman copper money.
He has shown its originally low value, owing to the great abundance
of the metal; that as it afterwards became scarce, a reduction in the
weight of the coin followed naturally, not as a fraudulent depreciation
of it, but because a small portion of it was now as valuable as a large
mass had been before. The plenty of copper in early times is owing to
this, that where it is found, it exists often in immense quantities, and
even in large masses of pure metal on the surface of the soil. Thus the
Copper Indians of North America found it in such abundance on their hills
that they used it for all domestic purposes; but the supply thus easily
obtained soon became exhausted.
The small value of copper at Rome is shown not only by the size of the
coins, they having been at first a full pound in weight, but also by the
price of the war-horse, according to the regulation of Servius Tullius,
namely ten thousand pounds of copper.[17] This statement, connected as it
is with the other details of the census, seems original and authentic;
nor considering the great abundance of cattle, and other circumstances,
is it inconsistent with the account in Plutarch’s life of Publicola, that
an ox in the beginning of the commonwealth, was worth one hundred oboli,
and a sheep worth ten; nor with the provisions of the Aternian law, which
fixed the price of the one at one hundred asses and the other at ten.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account